Finish your book by January 23rd 3. Research the reasons why the book was banned or challenged. 4. Decide if you agree or disagree if the book should be banned. You can argue that it shouldn’t be read by a younger audience or in schools, but up to parents if children read it.
After reviewing and studing the first ethics case briefly and discussing with my group members carefully, the answer to the questions is obvious. Scott ought to tell Tom that he will inform the superior to prevent Tom to go ahead. Tom and Scott 's choice, taking care of the problem themselves rather than paying someone else to dispose of chemicals, is improper course of action. Assuming Scott has a chance to appear at a court hearing, he should frankly and unreservedly confess, state, testify true guilty action what ABC or Tom took, without concerning violation to his former company and head. And reasons for these answers will be discussed in the following paragraphs.
DARYL the GENERAL SUPERVISOR of MARKETING DEPARTMENT 1 Daryl the General Supervisor Nikki H. Johnson Everest University Online Introduction to Business-136 Angela Scott 10/23/12 DARYL the GENERAL SUPERVISOR of MARKETING DEPARTMENT 2 Daryl the General Supervisor Identify what you consider to be potentially unethical. Why do you think it is not ethical? I think it is unethical for Daryl, to use company time, resources and staff to fulfill His obligations to his book. He is using the secretary, interns to do his research and type his Personal work. The secretary is also for two other supervisors, and the interns are there to learn The job required of them.
All papers (response papers, prospectus, research paper) must be submitted in printed form in class during class time. A paper is considered late if it is not submitted in class on the date it is due. * There are no make-ups for the midterm exam. If a student misses the exam, the student receives a ZERO for the exam. * If you are absent for the in-class presentations, you will not receive credit for these assignments, i.e.
Course Team Project – Week 6 Report CanGo: Analysis and Recommendations Team B Dr. Kevin Hagans Devry University: Senior Project 10/13/2012 1. Problem: Company appears to be disorganized when it comes to internal structure and processes. Recommendation: To improve their managerial structure, CanGo needs to allocate resources and manage dependencies. According to a Harvard Review article written by Bob Frisch (2012), research shows that in business cases, companies often sail though the senior team meetings without those in attendance knowing exactly what they’re signing up for because senior executives already have an execution plan for what they want senior team members to accomplish. Liz and Warren need to make sure that projects are prioritized, assign who is responsible for what part of each project.
The board members are concerned with future lawsuits and want to discontinue the sale of the transistors to the pacemaker company. However, some board members that are not willing to lose the contract with the pacemaker company and some are in tow with dissolving the existing contract. Issues in Controversy: Whether or not your company should continue to sell transistors to the pacemaker company. Whether or not your company should be concerned about how the pacemaker company uses the transistors. Whether or not your company will be liable when there is a fatality caused by a failed transistor.
If they do so, it may lose logging data; however, it seems like it is the only way to assure customer data is not being stolen. “Every time we shut down traffic from an attacker’s address, the zombie we’ve shut down triggers attacks from ten other sites. If it’s a Dos attack, it’s not an intrusion, right?” The executive did not experience the attack before so she does not know how to react at that time. Recommendations and Next steps To prevent the attack happens again, Ipremier should arrange a consulting group to define a recovery plan when it occurs. For example, the executive should divide their works into different parts so they can react at the first time when problem happen instead of wasting time on contact each other or ask how to do so.
Employment-at-will gives employers the right to legally terminate an employee from a job whether the reason is good, bad or none at all (Halbert and Ingulli, 2012). So, by law I have the right to terminate Jennifer for not being productive and efficient in her daily tasks. I will take several steps before I actually come up with my final decision. As a manager for the accounting department I want what is best for the company and my employees. The company as a whole will do anything necessary to provide help and support of the staff members.
Leeper Lingerie Company Assignment #3 Sabrina Wingard Professor John Muehl Total Rewards – HRM 533 November 10, 2011 Do you think that Keith was justified in insisting that the job, not the person be evaluated? Explain your answer. I absolutely think that Keith was justified in insisting that the job, not the person be evaluated. As his job title states that he is the chairperson of the company’s job evaluation committee, which simply means that his main focus is to evaluate the job itself and not the character of the person with the job. Per an article on slideshare.net (n.d.), a job evaluation is where you thoroughly analyze and assess different jobs and their worth to an organization.
Daydreaming is a problem because the student is not focusing on the teacher and is missing important instruction that will be needed in order to complete assignments. She won't be able to complete her assignment during independent work time because she didn't hear the instructions, this will put her further behind in her academic progress. Behavior 2. The student is on a second grade reading level. This is a problem because most school work requires that you read instructions before completing a task.