Algorithm Workbench page 159 (6 through 10) 6. Rewrite the following If-Then-Else If statement as a Select Case statement. If selection == 1 Then Display “You selected A.” Else If selection == 2 Then Display “You selected 2.” Else If selection == 3 Then Display “You selected 3.” Else If selection == 4 Then Display “You selected 4.” Else Display “Not good with numbers, eh” End If // Type answer below Select Numbers Case 1: Display “You selected A.” Case 2: Display “You selected 2.” Case 3: Display “You selected 3.” Case 4: Display “You selected 4.” Case else Display “Not good with numbers, eh” End Select 7. Design an If-Then-Else statement that display “Speed is normal” if the speed variable is within the range 24 to 56. If speed holds a value outside the range, display “Speed is abnormal.” If speed > 24 AND speed < 56 Then Display “Speed is normal.” Else Display “Speed is abnormal.” End If 8.
EZ divisibility tricks were something that was new to me so, I was really interested in them they are ways to test numbers to see what their factors may be. An example is, if the sum of the digits is divisible by 3, then 3 is a factor of that number. Another topic in this chapter is greatest common factor (GCF). For this topic McKellar gives a definition and three methods for the reader to try. The first method is the list method which is listing all the factors of both numbers and finding the ones they have in common.
Code switching is a condition where people switch one language to another for certain purpose or reason in the same time. the changes of the two languages can be included in word, clause, or sentence level (Coupland and Jaworski,1997: 361). People may switch codes within a speech even to discuss particular topic (Holmes, 1992: 44). According to Cecilia Montes Alcala code swicthing in Tex-Mex or Spanglish is regarded as a phenomenon that is oftenly attribute to illeteracy, lack of formal education and proficiency in one or both languages (montes-alcala_1.pdf). Code Switching according to Brown and Attado (2003:84) can be divided into situational and metaphorical code switching.
There are lots of trait personality theories. Raymond Catell the pioneer of trait theory, reduced Allport’s list of 4000 terms to about 171 characteristics by eliminating terms that seemed to be redundant or uncommon. Later on Catell uses a statistical technique called factor analysis to identify the traits that were most eventually reduced to sixteen personality factors. Hans Eysenck a British psychologist also contributed to the trait personality, which he came up with three basic dimension of personality. Many trait theories felt Cattell’s trait model was too complex, and that his 16 personality’s factors could be reduced to a smaller, more basic set of traits.
CHAPTER 3 Empirical Statements: Can be both at once Empirical statements: * Plausible * Easily verifiable Testimonial statement- Other’s Experience * Plausible * Reliable * A giant flag is: "According to" Plausible: coheres with background knowledge Reliable: no history of deception, and no reason to deceive in current situation Definitional Statement: Definitional statements: A report about how a word is used * * Uncontroversial definition – may be assumed to pass the True Premises Test Ex: a triangle is a three-sided polygon Statements by experts: Experts: are people who have specialized knowledge in a field Passes these criteria: 1. C- Appropriate Credentials 2. L- lack of bias 3. E- expert consensus 4. A- appropriate are of expertise 5.
13 Discussion Pg. 13-14 References Pg.15 Appendices Pg. 16-17 Abstract This report is based on the experiment conducted to investigate the Stroop effect which is named after Ridley Stroop; a psychologist who observes that it takes people longer and with possible mistakes in reading aloud the name of colours when written in a different colour (incongruent word) than when it’s written in its own colour (congruent word). For example if you write red using blue ink it takes more time to read blue aloud than when writing red using red ink. As Brown and Warner (1915) have pointed out, the difference in speed in reading names of colours and in naming colours may be accounted for the difference in experience called the "automatic word recognition hypothesis" or, as others have claimed, certain mental activities happen automatically even when not consciously stimulated by the subject.
Webster’s defines “perfect” as, “Having no defect or fault; flawless; accurate; absolute.” While Webster’s definition for “ideal” is, “ A concept or imagined state of perfection; highly desirable; perfect; an ultimate objective.” Now that we know what the words mean, and that they do in fact mean roughly the same thing, we need to apply that to our idea of what makes an ideal husband. So, according to the definitions, an ideal husband would be someone without defect or fault, basically flawless, perfect and thus highly desirable. But what then would be considered defects, faults or flaws? What makes one highly desirable compared
Conclusion A. I agree with the pursuit of happiness of inalienable rights. B. Thomas Jefferson wrote the Declaration of Independence C. Education is a significant role in one’s pursuit of happiness. D. Decide if these pursuits are in fact, inalienable rights. Becky Knighton Professor Jarrell English 101 20 February 2015 I Believe the Pursuit of Happiness is an Inalienable Right In my opinion the pursuit of happiness is an inalienable right which
As far as coding is concerned, there are also differences between short term and long term memory; short term is acoustic and long term is semantic. The multi-store model of memory is the first attempt into explaining the way that memory works and has led to further research into memory being undertaken but this explanation of memory is overly simplistic due to its one way system of memory. Lab research to support the multi-store memory was carried out by Peterson and Peterson; in their study, participants were presented with a trigram consisting of 3 consonants which they were asked to recall in the correct order after a delay of 3,6,9,12,15 or 18 seconds. Rehearsal of the trigram was prevented by counting backwards in 3s from a random 3 digit number. The findings of Peterson and Peterson’s research were that after 18 seconds, fewer than 10% of the trigrams were remembered by the participants.
d. Find two ways to put the game back into extensive form by drawing two new, distinct game trees. (Hint: the only way to do this is to represent the game as a dynamic game of imperfect information). e. Solve the game by backward induction. How would the solution differ if the game would only self-terminate with both players splitting the prize at the end of the 100th round (instead of the fourth)? 2.