Assess the View That the Role of Education Is Positive for Society

1275 Words6 Pages
Assess the view that the role of education is positive for society Functionalists such as Emile Durkheim would say that education is positive because of social solidarity. Social solidarity is based on ‘essential similarities’ between members of society. They say that one of the main functions of education is to develop these similarities and in doing this they bind members of society together. Talcott Parsons also says that the role of education is positive for society in a number of ways. One way is that schools build on the primary socialisation provided by the family, developing value consensus. This shows that education is positive for society because it is allowing children to have a greater knowledge and understanding of these values which their parents have taught them. Education prepares people for their adult roles in a few different ways. For example, schools focus on individual achievement. Young people are encouraged to achieve as individuals. This prepares young people for their adult roles as they’re encouraged to achieve as individuals is exactly what they would be doing in the world of work. Another reason as to why education is positive for society is because everyone is given an equal opportunity. Schools transmit this value by offering everyone an equal chance of success. This shows that education is positive for society because if everyone is given an equal opportunity it means that young people all are able to do well if they put their mind to it. However, this could be seen as a negative because if everyone has an equal opportunity to do well and they all took that opportunity then the lower class jobs would become non-existent and this indeed would cause a problem for society. Schools reflect values of the wider society. Young people are required to act in a certain way in the classroom as they would be in the world of work. This shows
Open Document