It’s beneficial as there are male and female role models available for the children, and it gives the parents more control of how their children are brought up. Another strength is that there’s less interference from wider family members however this can also be seen as a negative aspect, as other people are unaware of what’s happening and if there was any problems within the family and therefore it’s difficult to identify neglect. This also makes it difficult to seek professional help outside of the family. Another disadvantage of this privatised nuclear family is that children are only exposed to one set of values and so are influenced to become like their parents in the future as they have no exposure to other behaviours of different families. A criticism of this
New right thinkers however; believe that these laws undermine the traditional male dominance in families, but many believe these new policies for women and children strengthen the family rather than weaken it. Sociologists such as new right thinkers argue that the Labour party has constructed a ‘nanny state’ which over-intervenes in personal living arrangements. The Labour party have constructed many laws beneficial for women in families as they have realised most families now rely of two
The New Right also believes that a successful school will gather sufficient momentum to build on its successes. They also see the major role of education is the development of skills and knowledge required to compete in the outside market. They believe that schools should be managed in the same way as businesses However, some theorists such as Chubb and Moe would argue that American state education has failed and they make the case for opening it up to new marker forces of supply and demand. They claim that disadvantaged groups (lower classes, ethnic minorities ect) have been badly served by state education due to the failure to create equal opportunity. Theyâd argue that state education is inefficient because it fails to produce pupils with the skills needed by the economy and
However new right theorists favour this sector as it saves moms for the state as they are hostile to state expenditure. The voluntary sector consists of organisations, usually charities which provide welfare and are set up to deal with social problems such as old age, poverty, homelessness or child abuse. Advantages of the voluntary sector are that it employs trained staff as well as volunteers, it is professionally organised, it reduces dependence on state funding as the sector's income does not come primarily from the state. One problem with the voluntary sector is that it's funding is not always guaranteed so it cannot always provide continuity of service. Market liberals support this type of provision because it reduces reliance on state funding and encourages individual responsibility and community
After this law there was an increase in lone parent families, cohabiting and even same sex couples, this was because it started to be more socially acceptable and married couples didn’t have to be forced into a relationship if they weren’t happy. However, The New Right did not like the idea of having lone parent families, they said that lone parents (mostly mothers) cannot discipline their children properly and are a burden on the welfare state as they need to claim benefits due to the fact that they are not working so they can’t support their children. Conservatives see marriage as the essential basis for creating a stable environment for bringing up children, so I don’t think that they are very happy with the fact that family diversity is such a big deal in our society nowadays as they have a very traditional view. Similarly to The New Right’s view, Chester in 1985 claimed that people aspire to be in a nuclear family because that is the way that most people in the UK have been brought up, he also claimed that most people live in a household headed by a married couple and will most likely be the head of a nuclear family in the future. He believes that the nuclear family is the ideal type of family where the husband is the breadwinner and the wife is the housewife
Rusbult and Martz used this theory to explain why victims of domestic abuse remain in relationships, as they may still be in profit from the relationship despite the ‘cost’ of abuse. This profit may be due to the high investment the person has placed in the relationship, such as children. However this theory has many weak points, one being that you can’t accurately assess costs and benefits within a relationship making it hard it attribute maintenance of relationships on a profit from the relationship. The theory can also be viewed as reductionist for it focuses solely on the costs and benefits of the relationship for the individual with relationships being much more complex than this. As well as omitting factors such as emotion from consideration, despite the basis of what we believe to be a ‘romantic relationship’ being based on feelings and emotion.
On the other hand, Cousins wants us to help the poor because it actually helps them. Cousins address that, “the best way to bring down the birth rate is not to let people starve, but to give them a better life.” (Cousins 733) And the best way to give them a better life, Cousins states, is not by “cutting back on aid, we ought to be stepping up shipments of fertilizer, chemicals, plows, tractors, harvesting machines, tools, engines, dynamos, and thousands of other items involved in upgrading living standards.”(Cousins 733) Not helping the poor or “Hardinism can become a wild
Refugees have also been made available for women by the government, which have allowed women to escape domestic violence. However, some feminists argue social policies reinforce patriarchal ideas of men and women. For example, tax/benefit policies assume husbands are the main wage earners and this means women can find it difficult to claim benefits in their own right, which reinforces women’s dependency on men. Therefore, some women may less likely to get divorced so may be left in an empty shell
For example, welfare benefits do it can help subsidy their family. By its very nature, the aspiration of this thesis toward Carol Stack and The Moynihan Report clashes with conflict with how black communities lived in poverty and how the only way to survive was through solidarity and exchange/ swapping within the African American communities (Stack) and how the black family structure was decrepit due to dysfunctional number of "matriarchal" family hierarchy or the diversity within and among black families. The lack of the economic mobility and social mobility of the people/workers are necessary for the upper and middle classes because it keeps the economy going. It helps a lot of policies like for example welfare. Welfare positions the current situations rather than the policies that would probably change the structure of our economics that forces our black urban poor people into the high poverty range.
Lechevsky compares the speaker to a jewel to emphasize her oppression by the parents. The parents aim to raise a healthy and presentable child for their own personal gain, to show off to other people. The section emphasizes the disillusioned nature of the oppressive force on the LGBT