Speech gives us the power to change and grow as individuals and as a nation. Freedom of speech makes us feel safe and secure in knowing that our government will listen to us and not punish us for speaking our minds. Other countries do not have the luxury of expressing their opinions without being punished and even killed. Since they cannot tell their government what they want nothing
Like as for a crime things can be said differently which can cause the incident to pay for the price. There can also be favoritism. For workplace, it is also very hard because some places do not allow any of their workers to show any sign of their religions which they think will cause a controversy with other works or clients. Even in television people cannot be prejudice or it will cause trouble with the show. They would have to go through securities, FBI and government to make sure that they are free from prejudice.
They were not inventing anything new but reclaiming something ancient. This is why governments tend to fall apart, because people often want to come together freely and be themselves, rather then fit a mold that is presented for them. Hobbes foretold that it was a human condition that war fought by each against each, making it hard for anything good to come out of it, or learn
Manipulation of media is of course one of the main factors. Nowadays, we know all too well how easily it is for media corporations to support one political agenda or another by twisting facts and feeding false information. Consumerism, supported and viralized by media, also carries a message which tends to separate those who consume a certain kind of product from those who do not, stating that the former are happier than the latter. This exercises certain social pressure among consumerist individuals who may somehow see their social status affected and thus feel left out. As a result, the key for the survival of individuality lies in how conformist the people are ready and willing to become.
If the government were to ban this because of its highly offensive and challenging nature, the people might slowly see their freedom of speech disappear as more and more ‘offensive’ actions were banned. The framers were not ignorant to the possibility of flag burning; they formatted the Constitution to protect the freedoms of the people- including the freedom to protest the government which is supposed to strive to protect those freedoms. Though the people may be offended by these actions, we must attempt to defend the ideals the flag represents instead of their physical form; for these ideals cannot be destroyed by fire, but they can be damaged by the restrictions of the freedoms the flag represents. The Amendment proposed to ban flag desecration would affect many Americans. Strict laws would prevent all flag burning- even the respectful disposal of flags by organizations like the Boy Scouts.
I argue that having the ability to be controversial is what makes art, art. In truth, "the freedom of expression" is a lie because while we all possess it, we don't speak our mind in fear of being ridiculed or having our opinions written off. Art is the only medium, where one's thoughts, no matter how controversial, can be presented in anyway they want, there shouldn't be a "taking it too far" with art. Everything is appropriate in art. Writers Week is a event that allows people to say things they would not normally say in a school environment, or share thoughts they wouldn't share with people, whether it be the f-bombs 'Mutts' dropped or the swears that student presenters uttered while reading their speeches,their art brought some crudeness into our sugar coated school environment.
There are pros and cons for public speaking, some cons are if people speak too much, it could jeopardize the security of our country. The establishment of free speech for all citizens is a successful political strategy for everyone; for people who disagree with those in power as well as those who agree. Allowing free speech adds to the marketplace of ideas, and keeps society involved in important issues. If there was not public speech there would be no media, or newspaper, people wouldn’t be informed about things that concern or help citizens. Some individuals are afraid to protest, because people don’t agree with the government, can become dangerous and get out of control, and they can even danger themselves as well as the safety, property, and lives of
The first amendment grants us to express our thoughts and beliefs in a free society unlike most third class and communist countries. The first amendment includes the following rights; freedom of assembly, freedom of press, freedom of religion, freedom of speech, and freedom of petition. In so many countries freedom of speech is banned, without the first amendment one would fear to even protest because they could easily be silenced, religious groups could be victimized, and citizens could not mobilize for or against social change. We wake up every day and practice these rights without even acknowledging it. We have a right to say and do what we like as long as we are obeying federal and state
When the government gets into the private information of citizens, it shows disrespect, and this can cause significant harm to the individuals. Citizens who suffer such excesses by their governments lean towards civil disobedience and engage governments in protests. The management of reputation is essential for every individual. The citizens effectively manage their reputations when their information is private, and they are not prone to access to others. It is in the standings that the social boundaries of individuals find protection.
This is human nature at its worse if, we get angry at someone and shut down the lines of communication, we will avoid them, and eventually we cease to be willing to even work with that person. With the same responsibilities being shared there is sense of competitionamong private and public forces. The private force wants to show there assertiveness, and ability not to be out done. They also feel the need for competiveness, if they are not involved in anissue they may appear to not be doing their job and lose the account. Private security agencies must constantly be promoting themselves by proving the local police, and even direct competitors cannot provide the same level of protection or services.