As the main issue at stake is the process of the matter; therefore the principle of duty must be followed. The ethical expert would advise “2 Day FM’s Hot 30” to exercise self-restraint and act ethically as it is their duty. Despite the temptation to please audiences and to achieve high ratings and revenues by humorous pranks, duty must prevail and the prank must not be aired. Furthermore, individuals in and outside the business universally should be treated with respect and should not be treated as a means to an end. To not air such pranks; this can be easily accepted universally, which is in compliance with Kantian ethics.
People have the right to make decisions daily that have no other influential factors but when it comes to being safe they are interfered by those who grant them this freedom. If someone wants to be dumb, let them be dumb, they made their choices because they were allowed to make those choices. Freedom of speech is most likely the biggest freedom that is debated and not completely understood by anyone except the people who came up with this amendment. Freedom of Speech means: The right of people to express their opinions publicly without governmental interference, subject to the laws against libel, incitement to violence or rebellion, etc. (taken from
For example, copy right laws if you use an artist song to make a track of your own but it has pieces of their song in it you must give them credit by posting a disclaimer with it or risk being sued. This is technically not stealing at that point because you have stated that you do not own any rights to the song you used to make your own track. My ethical strengths are self-awareness and justice, I strive to maintain fairness for the entire community, and I do my best to be just in all of my actions to achieve the most logical and beneficial end result of any project. My weakness is the
As people we should have the freedom to think and believe whatever we want, no one else should be able to tell you that what you think and believe is wrong or right in a sense that would make it illegal to believe that. In America this law is not implied and that is the reason that people from all different countries risk their lives to come to America. They want a new start where they can be themselves and believe what they want, the opposite of what this law/idea will do when implied. This is one of the reasons America is considered one of the greatest countries to live in.
Thoreau believes if we can make governments less intrusive in the future, it will open the door for possible opportunities of eliminating the government altogether because people have the capacity to regulate their own lives and be independent. Thoreau knows his disapproval towards the government is more of an expression than anything else. Thoreau's views are very well thought and could make some difference, however it cannot be realistically achieved as it is the endpoint of the way societies develop and evolve. Thoreau's desire to limit the power of the government comes with consequences. How do you make sure everybody has the guarantee of freedom and equality that the government should protect for all of its citizens?
Machiavelli has strongly persuasive arguments on leadership since he apprehends in his famous book ‘The Prince’ in chapter 17 the human nature very accurately. He reveals that how crucial it is for a prince being aware of the dangers within the city in order to achieve dominance in the state. He offers a possible threat to the prince as people’s in sincerity. Since human beings are inherently self-seeker and ungrateful, they may easily let down the prince in case of a dangerous situation. (Machiavelli 71) Therefore, when it comes to people’s benefits, the rupture of relations between the prince and his people may be broken.
The false dichotomy of liberty versus security is accompanied by another myth: that someone else’s rights are always the ones at risk, that I can give up their rights for my safety. It seems a comfortable bargain (Shipler 2). This directly relates to when Winston betrayed Julia to protect himself, and only himself. But today, you can’t give up the rights of someone else to protect yourself; everyone is supposed to have equal rights. Still in today’s society though, people are treated unequally.
Philosophically, the term good has been used to denote the happiness associated with the act. However, it should be noted that allowing the physician assisted suicide to be determined by the public’s views is bound to prevent the individual from exercising his or her independence. This is because there is no way to determine whether the public’s decision is absolute or not. This is because the public is bound to act against the eternal knowledge (DuBose,
Actually there are two sides in this issue, one of them is the ideals and the literal concepts that they have wished to keep and the other one is the lived fact that exists on the reality. On one hand, the American dream ideals of freedom are: people are equal; all humans have the same rights and no superiority at all. These are the theories that have been figured out to establish a society based on justice and fairness. Being free according to the American Dream is to illuminate any constrains or restrictions. On the political side, everyone is free to reject, to revolute and simply to say no.
Therefore, these are rights that can’t be taken away or unalienable, unalienable rights are rights that are unable to be alienated, given up, or transferred to someone else. They come from God, and no man or government can rightly give them or take them away. Some examples of unalienable rights are life; liberty; self-government; to bear arms; to purchase, develop and dispose of property; make personal choices; free conscience; choice of profession; choice of a mate; to assemble; to petition; and to free speech. Lastly, even with times passing and things changing, we have to remember that we the people are the authority in America. We have to educate ourselves for the sake of progress while still reminding ourselves that our Constitution is