Articles Of Confederation Vs. Constitution

482 Words2 Pages
The United States Constitution remedied the weakness of the Articles of Confederation by totally replacing it as the national law of the thirteen states. The Constitution put the ideas of the Articles of Confederation into greater detail by enumerating the rights of the people, the states, and the federal government. As the thirteen colonies were getting closer towards independence during the Revolutionary War, they needed to establish a unified government that would be enforced if the colonies were to win the revolution. In addition to that, the colonies needed a way gain support from France by showing that they were committed to the cause. After ratification of the Declaration of Independence, Continental Congress had a new task of creating a new document that would establish a foundation for a centralized government, enforced in all thirteen states, which would be known as the Articles of Confederation. After the colonies had finally proved triumphant from the War of Independence, the thirteen colonies ratified the Articles of Confederation over a course of a few years following the victory. However, it was not long until people began to realize that the Articles had given very little power to the central government, while they had given the states too much power, and created a weak governing foundation for the new nation. In attempt to fix the weakness existent in the Articles of Confederation, the Congress of Confederation (previously known as the SecondContinental Congress) convened. By mid-June of 1787, it had become clear to the delegates that it was necessary to start from scratch, and completely rewrite the Articles of Confederation, creating the United States Constitution. Although the Articles of Confederation had several accomplishments such as being the first constitution for the United States and Great Land Ordinances, it was a cause of many
Open Document