Aristotle’s Take on Macbeth

4144 Words17 Pages
Aristotle’s Take on Macbeth Hanad Elmi The play Macbeth, written by William Shakespeare is known as one of the greatest tragedies ever wrote. Also, Aristotle is known as one of the greatest philosophers, he used his own description of a tragedy to measure how good a tragedy really is. According to Aristotle, a tragedy must consist of a plot, characters, diction, thought, spectacle, and song or melody. Whether Macbeth is a good tragedy or not completely depends on these categories. In most peoples eyes the plot is the most important, it is the structure of incidents in a cause-and-effect chain. Tragedy deals with evil, with what we do not want and fear most to face, and with what is destructive to human growth. Tragedy also denies us from feeling sympathy for the protagonist or the character that has the tragic flaw. Shakespeare’s goal was to get the reader to feel pity and fear for Macbeth. Does the reader feel he is part of the evil Macbeth creates? Or does the reader feel the desire and greed Macbeth thrives on? These are basic questions that run through your mind while you are reading the play. I believe that most of the readers think Macbeth is the bad guy because it is the more likely reaction. Aristotle believes that the main character in a tragedy should have a tragic flaw. But due to Aristotle’s detailed definition of a tragedy, most would fail because usually they tend to be dependant on an outside source to apply the tragic flaw. This gives the character no choice, and is forced to commit an undeserved error or mistake, it is then no longer self-contained. This violates Aristotle’s definition of a tragedy because it is his personal motivation that is supposed to start the cause-and-effect chain. In Macbeth, Shakespeare does a really good job with the tragic character because he simply

More about Aristotle’s Take on Macbeth

Open Document