Thereafter, an evaluation will be made as to who has a better understanding of the nature of human. One of the differences that Lotario and Pico had about human nature is the behavioural traits of humankind. Lotario felt that human has “three natural forces: the rational to distinguish between good and evil, the irascible to reject evil, the appetitive to desire good” (Lotario The Misery of the Human Condition Ex I:3) and three opposite vices(Lotario The Misery of the Human Condition Ex I:3). The three vices that corrupted these three natural forces are ignorance, anger and lust respectively (Lotario The Misery of the Human Condition Ex I:3). Lotario feels that humans’ soul have the positive forces in them.
A virtue is defined as a perfect quality that is habitually carried out by an individual which requires practise and dedication so that one may blossom into a virtuous character, “excellence is not an act but a habit.” For Aristotle, something is ‘good’ if it fulfils its purpose: a good knife is one this is sharps and cuts well. This concept is based upon his idea of cause and purpose. He posited four causes for everything; the formal cause - the kind of thing that something is (e.g. a chair), the material cause – the matter from which the thing is made from (e.g. the wood of a chair), the efficient cause – the agent that brings something about (e.g.
Typical words that could be said when in an argument are “that’s not fair”, “you are wrong” and “how’d you like it if anyone did the same to you?”.The point Lewis is trying to make is that all humans, whether intentionally or not, follow some standard of behavior and expect others to follow it just as well. If there were no standard for right and wrong then Hitler’s actions would be considered acceptable behavior. Fault would be non-existent without a source of truth. In other words there cannot be wrong unless is a standard of rightness to compare one’s behavior to. Another point C.S Lewis makes when in The Law of Human Nature is that this law applies to all humans in all places and at all times.
Lastly, they question whether people are just born bad. Referring back to Clarence Darrow, the authors state that “Darrow believed that Leopold and Leob were “born bad” because they were born without feelings as pity and sympathy,” in which they may agree. However, Anthropologist John Townsend writes, that humans are wired for certain behaviors and the behaviors will emerge whether we want them to or not…but that does not mean that we have to act on it. Quotes: “We come equipped by nature with deep-seated desires that we can only resist with difficulty.” “We need an explanation for why some people, but not others, are able to resist the impulses that nature has given
Need for possession is knowledge. Knowledge has its purpose to aim at good. External good, need for possession to wealth, and other goods for the body and soul. Men pursue honor in order to assure their goodness and wisdom that they seek to be honor and believe that virtue is better. Being able to provide for your own without any help from anyone is self-sufficient is a possession that people want to have
I don’t think he is a good man just because he trying to fix what he did, but the thing is that what has happened, happened and you can’t change that. Yes he is trying fixing it but I wouldn’t call him a good man because of his actions. The actions are what make the people either good people or bad people. In Antigone there are both bad and good people. In Teirsias’s mind he would probably say they were all good people because when they did something wrong they tried to fix it.
King notes, “Any law that uplifts human personality is just. Any law that degrades human personality is unjust. All segregation statutes are unjust because segregation distorts the soul and damages the personality” (King 8). Basically, King is saying that there are two types of laws that society use. One law is considered just because it favors the human beings personality and elevates him morally, while the other law is considered unjust because it demeans human personality.
Adversity Essay Discovering ones true personality in life is determined through various hindrances, but it also acts as a catalyst that sparks up untouched traits unknown by man itself. Through trial and error adversity can change a perfectly sane man into one who has seen the gates of death or in other words delusional. Adversity presents both a mental and physical struggle altering a person’s everyday complexion therefor transforming them either positively or negatively depending on their natural state of mind. Thus when all completed their true image is shown. Adversity is guidance that helps shape ones personality challenging both mentally and physically.
Dewey believes we consider these more as abilities that exist far from our impulsive desires. So in short, bad habits are acts that make us feel shameful, good habits are admirable. John Dewey mentions though out his writing on habits and will WE are our habit. Now even though I do not entirely comprehend all the points he makes through out the writing, I do know that he mentions several times that to fix or undo our bad habits we must replace with an equally energizing habit that is of goodness. Also to go along with that, you must be able to have more than solely will power to defy a habit.
If the offender feels as if it is more beneficial to continue to slack off because of the work required to put forth an effort, the punishment will be useless. 3. What’s the downside of using punishment? Of using positive reinforcement? The downside of using punishment is that it can make the punished feel coerced and sometimes trapped, and in extreme cases actually lash out against the punisher in an act of retribution.