Arguments Against Stem Cell Litigation

1410 Words6 Pages
Stem Cell Research Litigation The debate over stem cell research, and whether or not it should be made legal, is very complicated and long-standing. Stem cell research involves investigating whether or not embryonic stem cells can be used to potentially cure a number of diseases, including Parkinson’s, Alzheimer’s, and many others. The theory is that, since stem cells are able to differentiate into any other cell in the body, that they can be used to create healthy cells where once there were cancer cells, thus treating the disease. Stem cells have already been used to repair disease-ridden tissue successfully in patients (Neel & Silberner, 2011). However, there are many who oppose the use of embryonic stem cells in research, particularly among the pro-life community. The use of stem cells from human embryos has stirred controversy because of its associations with abortion, still thought to be immoral by conservative elements of the debate. Because the human embryo has to be destroyed in order to harvest the stem cell, it is claimed to be akin to murder by those anti-abortion elements. In this paper, the history of litigation in the US regarding stem cell research will be examined and compared to the declarations made in other countries throughout the world. In light of the…show more content…
A heated debate has arisen stating that federal funding should not be used to finance research that involves the destruction of embryos. Before beginning the discussion, it must be noted that there is no federal law in place to ban the research of stem cells, nor has there been; however, the restrictions typically deal with the ability to use federal money to fund this research. In 1995, Congress passed a law that stated that federal funds could not be used to finance any research that involved the creation or destruction of a human embryo, including stem cell

More about Arguments Against Stem Cell Litigation

Open Document