Per our constitution, this is the law. Next, the location of the Mosque would be erected two city blocks away from the actual ground zero site. Lastly, there is a clear difference between people who practice true Islamic religion and the extremists that are terrorist. Building this Mosque will help spread knowledge distinguishing between Islamic culture and the Al Qaeda terrorist. In 1787 a group of individuals met in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania to construct a document that would forever change American history.
Though alarming and upsetting, the stories of Dr. Mansoor Mirza’s troubling life experiences are a perfect example of how biased so many Americans really are. The one sentence that really blew my mind was one when Mirza, a well-respected Muslim doctor in Wisconsin, was at the planning commission meeting trying to open a mosque nearby and it said “[h]e kept calm when a commissioner asked if there would be any weapons or military training at the mosque.” I was shocked that someone would go so far as to assume that just because this highly respected doctor was Muslim, he was building a mosque specifically for homegrown terrorism. Considering that nearly one fourth of the world’s populous is Muslim, like Ster said in the last paragraph of “Don’t Fear Islamic Law in America”, it just doesn’t make sense if thought of it as one fourth of the world being
In Koran, while the woman was trying to seduce Joseph, he mentioned about God. He said “God forbid!” He used God to reject her and then used her husband. However, in Bible, Joseph used her husband as an excuse first and then God. God in Koran is more powerful in Islam’s mind and God has power over all things that what God said is undoubtedly correct and have to abide by. Furthermore, Islam should fear of God so that Joseph in Koran would mention God at first to warn master’s wife.
We have not seen him in action four years ago we just heard what he had to say about why he should be elected as president we heard his words of persuasion about change. However actions speak louder than words and his actions did not show favor to Israel. My current opinion on Obama was formed through the process of social learning; my view of him was acquired through observing his actions. My reasons for not wanting Obama reelected is an example of reactance, I feel that Obama being reelected is a danger to Israel’s personal freedom. “President Barack Obama’s longtime pastor at Trinity United Church, Rev.
Controversy surrounding mosque near 9/11 sites Mosque in lower Manhattan Plans to build a Mosque near the site of the World Trade Center attacks have been circulating in the national news since early 2010. The mosque is to become part worship center, part cultural awareness center for New York city’s Muslim community . The center will be open to the general public and will have many communal facets for all to enjoy. It has become a huge controversial issue as to whether plans for construction should continue or not. Regardless of personal views and opinions of the public, the building of the Community and Prayer center is not violating any laws and has the First amendment of the constitution to secure it freedoms.
* Sergeant at Arms: Kris * Themed meetings to come… * President: Jason * Camp Miakonda trip/retreat September 12-14th. Please let DJ or I know if you will be there at all, even if you do not plan to spend the night. * We need to bring supplies for this!!!! (Such as sleeping bags, pillows, food, etc.) * Possible dates for the Haunted Barn: Thursday October 23rd, Friday October 24, and Saturday October 25th OR just Thursday October 23rd and Friday October
For example, he states that Islam is a religion firmly rooted in the traditions of Jewish and Christian Scriptures or explains how “Jihad” is originally meant only for defensive purposes. Similarly, How to Win A Cosmic War: Globalization, and the End of the War on Terror, another work by Reza Aslan he explains the realities of many muslims and fundamentalists have come to view the problems in their life, their analytical process and consequently their ideological assumptions. Here also Aslan distinguishes groups like “Hamas” that have political adjectives unlike, the jihadist group “al-Quaida” which are often taught to have the same objectives. The point is clear, if nations want to learn to live with each other 2 without having to go to war they have to, at least understand each other. Another overlapping theme, is challenging the concept that the worlds grievances are based on larger issues like religion as in, “Clash of Civilizations Theory” or taking part in the “Cosmic War” rhetoric.
Behind Romney’s Decision to Attack Obama on Libya by David E. Sanger and Ashley Parker (New York Times) In an article published on September 12, 2012, journalists focus on Mitt Romney’s decision to attack Obama’s foreign affairs and draw some spotlight to him. Recently, the Obama administration has been dealing with increasing tensions in Cairo, an area in which protests have been occurring and most importantly, the deaths of the ambassador to Libya and others. Romney states in his speech that instead of apologizing for America and the violence that has happened in diplomatic facilities of this area, the Obama administration should have defended the interests of Americans more efficiently. The next day, we learn that the events that occurred in this region have become clear and in fact Romney’s statement is wrong. Now the tables have turned and the criticism turns to Romney and his reasoning for this attack on Obama.
1178; (1998) 142 S.J.L.B. 248; (1998) 142 S.J.L.B. 230; Times, July 23, 1998 Case Digest Subject: Criminal procedure Other related subjects: Criminal law Keywords: Intention; Jury directions; Murder Summary: jury directions; murder; intention; appropriate direction to be given on accused's intention Abstract: W appealed against the dismissal of his appeal against conviction of the murder of his three month old son, whom he had thrown onto a hard surface after losing his temper, arguing that he had not intended to cause the baby serious harm. The trial judge had, towards the close of his summing up, which was otherwise in accordance with R. v Nedrick (Ransford Delroy) [1986] 1 W.L.R. 1025 , directed the jury that they could infer such an intention if they were satisfied that, in throwing his son, W appreciated that there was a substantial risk of causing serious injury.
In the story “They Each Had a Gun,” Hannah LaMarca was robbed and assaulted with no way to defend herself. Had she been armed and trained in the use of a firearm, it is likely the outcome would have been different. We also can’t ignore the usefulness of a firearm as a deterrent to a criminal. Gun control advocates are so quick to cite statistics of gun deaths from any source they latch on to. It’s a shame that we don’t have much statistics for crimes that have been adverted because a robber or rapist changed his mind about attacking an armed person.