Argument Of Frumpy Or Chic? Tweed Or Kente

899 Words4 Pages
Corruption in Education Many students come to college to experience a new way of life and to form a new understanding of the world. They rely on their professors to provide them with the information necessary to achieve their goals. A classroom is most beneficial to a student when there is no ignorance or closed-mindedness. If the professor teaches both sides of issues and allows the class to debate topics without manipulating the students to believe what the professor believes, it gives the students all the tools they need to succeed in that specific class and in the future. In Alison Schneider’s essay, “Frumpy or Chic? Tweed or Kente” Sometimes Clothes Make the Professor” Camille Paglia says, “Yes, teaching is a performance art. But when the teacher hijacks the classroom for self-display – of fashion or mannerism or cult of personality – we have a corruption of education (143).” Some believe that their professors should use the classroom for self-display. People want their professors to look professional and clean-cut, and of course personality is important as well because without a personality, the professor is just plain boring. Without a sports jacket and dress pants professors look trashy and can’t be taken seriously. Students want their professors to dress up every day, otherwise they don’t believe the professor should be there. Students also want their professors to be passionate about the subject they teach because if the professor doesn’t care about the subject and doesn’t want to be there, then the students definitely won’t want to be there either. Despite what others think about the personality and fashion of professors, there are other ways to think about it. When I have a class and the professor is passionate about the subject, the class basically passes itself. However there is a limit of passion that a professor should have. If the professor
Open Document