Are Science Theories Convincing?

1095 Words5 Pages
What is it about theories in the natural and human science that make them convincing? A theory is a supposition or a system of ideas intended to explain an idea or occurrence. In the fields of natural and human science, there are many theories that have been declared by experts, in order to explain random occurrences and patterns. Any expert can publish a theory on a specific concept, but in order for that theory to be accepted by society first. This is where the convincing element of a thesis and theory should be very persuasive and eminent. Without a major consensus from other experts and other people in that field, a theory cannot be accepted to be true. There are many aspects of both sciences that help make theses and conjectures convincing. These aspects are: observation, collection of empirical evidence, and generally the scientific method. These aspects are the main reasons behind theories being cogent and compelling. As we all know Natural Science theories are not unerring. Yet many theories are so convincing that we, the public, seem to accept them immediately. So now we look at what makes Natural Science so convincing. Theories in Natural science are constructed to explain, predict, and master phenomena. They must be empirically testable or lead to retro dictions that are testable. This is extensively know as the scientific method. The scientific method is one reason is that we put our confidence in scientists. To yield and to develop their theories and conclusions. The scientific method for the natural sciences relies the most on reasoning as the way of knowing. This method attempts to test observations and have reliable and reproducible results, a process in which many participate in and improve upon with the aim of describing the world in an objective manner. This means that a theory in the field of natural science must be tested until the
Open Document