Are Fish Oils Overrated

325 Words2 Pages
ARE FISH OILS OVERRATED? Summary Public interest in healthy living is increasing across the world, sparking a huge demand for the supplements market. However knowledge of biological roles of fish oil supplements is not widely known and so cheaper and lower quality made supplements which otherwise seem ‘value for money’ are unlikely to offer health benefits that combat many risk-factors of modern day diseases or deficiencies as would those supplements that have been molecularly distilled to extract impurities and maximise concentrations of the eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) (Bailey, 2009). Another important factor to highlight is that omega-6 fatty acids work in combination with omega-3 fatty acids and this balance also needs to be maintained. This study is about highlighting the risk-factors of fish-derived supplementation and what dosages are best to help fight pathological diseases of the cardiovascular, immune and neurological systems, and if these levels are in all fish oil supplements that are currently on the market or is the use of these fish oil supplements overrated and of little effect, evaluation of the products on the market was reviewed and compared to known scientific benefits of taking the natural fish oils in a diet. The results and conclusion of the study revealed evidence of toxins in fish oils derived from fish liver and this contamination rendered many supplements of fish oils unusable for pregnant women and infants further to this the amount of omega 3 in most supplements was below that which would prove significantly active and given that omega 6 would also be required for omega 3 to be active most supplements only had omega 3. However from research it is undoubtedly that the benefits of fish oils containing omega 3 and omega 6 are beneficial to developmental health, which arrived at conclusion that
Open Document