Appeals Process: Checks And Balance System

1129 Words5 Pages
Appeals Process Paper CJS/220 Melissa Lovin Appeals Process An appeal is a proceeding in which a case is brought before a higher court for a review of a lower court’s decision, in hopes that it will overturn a lower court’s judgment on a case. In criminal cases, both the prosecution and the defense can make an appeal. Defendants can always appeal a conviction if appropriate legal grounds exist. The government cannot usually file an appeal on someone who has been acquitted. Once a person is acquitted, he or she cannot be tried for the same crime again. Appeals factor in the overall criminal process and procedures in that the appeals process is a part of a checks and balance system. The checks and balance system is designed to make sure…show more content…
After many appeals, in 2007, DNA evidence technology that was used proved that none of the DNA at the crime scene matched any of the three defendants. There was a hair found linked to the step father of one of the children, which was found in the knots of the rope used to bind one of the other boys (not even his own step son). Some of the country’s leading pathologists have presented evidence that the wounds found on the children were primarily the result of post mortem animal bites, and not knife wounds, as prosecutors originally believed. Juror misconduct was also uncovered in the case, which revealed that Jessie Misskelley was coerced into making a confession that was not…show more content…
There was going to be a new trial, which would create a challenge for the prosecution in light of the DNA evidence. The appeal was never waited on even though it was granted due to the fact that they would have had to be in jail another six months and if anything went to the appeal, Echols could have been executed. He was the friend of the other two convicted and they did not want to see, or be responsible in any way, for their friend being executed. The courts would never have let the defendants out if they had not known their innocence found with the new DNA evidence. The state did not want to have to admit that they arrested innocents and locked them up for 18 years. Instead of a new trial, they had a press conference and hearing in August
Open Document