Anthropologist's Review of Robert Pickton

311 Words2 Pages
Robert’s relationships and social interaction were not fully developed. Being rejected in an attempt to build social interactions could definitely have caused Pickton to feel inferior. As this feeling of rejection continued, it developed into anger which he then chose to release through attacking the initial source of it all, women. With William being a simple pig farmer in rural Vancouver, he needed to overcome his feeling of inferiority and be dominant. With his limited relationships with the opposite sex, he was never taught how to be respectful towards women. Pickton worked on his farm, meaning he performed physical labour in order to earn his living. On the other hand, prostitution in the view of Pickton may have been a career that earned a living off of pleasure rather than pain; this might have been an unfair and morally unacceptable way to earn a living in the eyes of this murderer. From this, the man may have not felt any sympathy for these women, so he decided to indulge his guilt-free attitude in the killing of a specifically characterized group of targets. Looking at Pickton’s victims, it’s clear that the majority of the women were weak and unstable. ‘Elaine Allen, employed at Women's Information Safe House (WISH) drop-in center, had known five of the six victims and told the jury what she knew about them: how Andrea spoke softly and Georgina Papin was charming and outspoken; how the opinionated Sereena was often beat up and showed numerous tracks from drug use, while Mona had a demanding boyfriend who sent her out to make money. Andrea, she said, had been the best behaved client she'd ever had, being both polite and aware of the needs of others. They often spoke quietly about her difficult life…. the women worked as prostitutes to feed their children, because welfare payments were

    More about Anthropologist's Review of Robert Pickton

      Open Document