Anthony Hanamaayer Case Study

683 Words3 Pages
Anthony hanamaayer In 1987, Anthony Hanemaayer a resident of Toronto Ontario was charged with assault and break-and-enter following a home invasion which included a knifepoint attack on a 15 year old girl and an attempted rape. In his trial in 1989, Anthony pleaded guilty and was given a jail sentence of two years less a day. He did this because Anthony feared that he would be convicted for both charges and went on the advice of his lawyer to accept the Crown's offer of a two-year sentence in return for a guilty plea on the break-and-enter charge. Even though Hanemaayer was innocent he received poor advice from his lawyer about the prediction of being convicted after the victim's mother incorrectly identified him as the attacker. Auspiciously in 2006,…show more content…
Fearing conviction on both charges, Mr. Hanemaayer accepted the Crown's offer of a two-year sentence in return for a guilty plea on the break-and-enter charge. In 2006, Paul Bernardo independently confessed the 1987 crime to officers from the Toronto Sexual Assault Team, yet police did not divulge this information to Mr. Hanemaayer. AIDWYC became aware of Bernardo's confession in 2007, and offered to aid Mr. Hanemaayer. With AIDWYC's help, Mr. Hanemaayer was acquitted at the Ontario Court of Appeal on June 25, 2008. An Ontario man who says he pleaded guilty on the advice of his lawyer to a 1987 crime that Paul Bernardo later confessed to is suing Toronto police, the Ontario Attorney General and his former lawyer. Anthony Hanemaayer, now a 42-year-old resident of Harriston, Ont,, seeks $1.1 million in damages. The case stems from a 1987 knife assault on a 15-year-old girl in her Scarborough bedroom. At the time of his trial in 1989, Hanemaayer pleaded guilty and was given a jail sentence of two years less a day. Including eight months of pre-trial custody, he spent 16 months behind
Open Document