Does the Word “Guardianship” Cause Less Ethical Arguments? Animal rights groups have advocated that considering the pets’ owners as guardians will make the status of an animal higher. The words “owner” and “guardian” seem like they are simply synonyms of each other, but in the eyes of the court this altering of words would cause major legal implications. This would give the animal more rights that are similar to human’s rights. It would prevent animals from being considered as property of their owners and permit them to be companions.
He wants to be as peaceful and exuberant as the bird. “Green Finch and Linnet Bird”, sung by Jayne Wisener, from the musical Sweeney Todd, is about a young lady wondering how a bird can be so mirthful even though it lives in a cage. She is being held captive by a judge, and she is looking at a bird sadly, wishing she could be that happy and have that much song in her heart. In song, she asks a bird in a cage how it still sings without being free. She asks the bird to teach her to be blissful: “Green Finch, and Linnet Bird, nightingale, blackbird, teach me how to sing.
She goes to a tree trunk at Hollins Pond to watch the sunset. This particular time a yellow bird appeared and caught her eye. When she turned around to watch the bird she was looking straight at a weasel. They both startled each other and were locked in each other’s gaze. Then he disappeared.
Without getting too into it, It basically says that we all have a basic idea of how we want to be treated and how we should treat others. Kind of like the golden rule. Animals however have no moral compass. An animal my feel bad because of the consequences of a situation, but a human can feel compassion for another person in that situation. An animal will not act unless it is doing so for it’s own well being or the well being of it’s genes being passed on.
They were leaders and inspirations for others to follow. As much as both of them disliked the “pigs” and corrupt police, both of them where aware of how to act and talk when it came down to it. They both didn’t want trouble from the corrupt people putting them down. They knew there was a right and wrong way to say certain things. “ I say nothing, but inside I’m raging.
Animals do not have the ability to speak, have a thought process that can be communicated nor do they understand the human civilization. They deserve compassion and gentle treatment but not rights as far as humans go. 2. America has enough domestic issues of our own that we should be taking care of first. Defending other countries or invading other countries that we have no business interfering in causes us nothing but more problems.
Assumptions should play no part in critical thinking but unfortunately they do, and often. I know as humans we all make snap judgments, but the idea is to push aside our assumptions and judgments when we think critically. Thinking critically is a skill that you either have or you don’t, the ones who have it will ultimately be the ones to thrive in their respective fields. Though it may be difficult to avoid making assumptions, as professionals we have no choice. We can keep our assumptions to ourselves but unless we consider all aspects of the situation we are not thinking critically.
Proactive people always find an optimistic alternative when things go wrong. Covey states you can choose to not be miserable. You do not have to empower the weakness of others who are trying to control you, take control of your own life and do what you feel is best. When you are proactive, you want to act and not be acted upon and stay true to your human nature. Reactive people however always blame everything surrounding them for excuses of why they are not responsible or cannot do something.
This rule is just a hope (possibility) that someday each person will treat everyone else with kindness and will receive kindness from others. Ultimately, the core idea of The Golden Rule is just about dealing (treating) people with owns perspective. But in practice, people are not alike. They have personality differences. As a result, this rule is not well enough to be implemented in our personal life as well as professional life.
After that day we did not speak for about a month and during the month of not talking we would spread rumors about one another to try and hurt the other person. Finally, we both came to our senses and just decided to talk and figure out how to make our friendship work again. That’s when she apologized for doing what she did and that she broke up with him because she thought our friendship was more important. Furthermore, conflict can best described as having a disagreement or controversy