Drug manufacturers test medications on animals after they have been injected with viruses and diseases to see if the medications work on the animals. There are many companies who use animal research to test their products; unfortunately these organizations do not look for alternatives besides animal testing. If these atrocious acts were committed outside laboratories, they would be felonies. But animals suffer and die every day in laboratories with little or no protection from cruelty. It is immoral to
Rhetorical Analysis of The Evil of Animal Rights “The Evil of Animal Rights” is an article that was written by Alex Epstein and Yaron Brook. The article addressees the medical testing that is being done on animals. The author of the article talks about the medical advances that have been done using animals as testing. Without the animals, there wouldn't be as many new medicines and new cures that there are now. The author also talks about the protesters and the problems they have given to the companies that have any relation with animal testing.
Gore and the EPA so far. Under pressure from animal rights activists, with bipartisan support from Congress, the EPA has already admitted it didn't do its homework. Much of the "missing" data has been "found." Still Mr. Gore pushes on, advocating the testing of products that have been on the market for years. If he has his way, rat poison will be tested on rats -- care to hazard a guess about the results?
People have yet to realize that their favorite type of deodorant or those good-smelling fragrances they like to put on were once tested on animals. These animals are forced to swallow or inhale large quantities of a test substance or endure the pain of having chemicals applied to their sensitive eyes and skin (Peta). Many times the results of animal tests are often not applicable to humans, but even if a product has blinded an animal, it can still be marketed to you. Many testing centers keep such animals out of their natural surroundings, until time to experiment on them. Throughout that time these animals become so unadapt to their new surroundings, they become less likely to return to their natural state which gives those experimenting more reason to test them.
Biology Issue Report Subject: Are the results of animal testing in the cosmetics industry relevant and applicable to humans? The testing of cosmetics on animals has been banned in the EU since 2009; however other countries around the world (such as the USA) still use animals in these tests. In an attempt to predict safety and effectiveness of cosmetics and toiletries, regulators in countries like America require companies to prove that their products are safe and harmless towards human beings. The cosmetics companies are required to conduct these experiments - they do not simply test on animals because they want to. Many thousands of animals (such as rabbits, mice, rats and guinea pigs) are used every year in the tests, but how reliable and applicable are the results to humans?
The Price of Beauty Is it worth killing animals for a mascara? Many companies to create a new mascara scientists test the chemicals on rabbits to see its reaction. The result is, hundreds of rabbits blind or dead due to the creation of ONE mascara. Alternatives have been created all over the world for animal testing on cosmetics, which are more accurate, since rabbits, dogs, cats, etc. don’t react the same way as us.
Many argued that alternatives for testing products should be utilized. Although there are other alternatives, to this day, animals are being experimented on for people’s needs such as cosmetics and medical purposes. Animal testing for cosmetic purposes first started in 1933 when a woman used Lash Lure mascara, it burned her eyes, which made her blind and eventually led to her death. The Food and Drug Administration therefore passed a law called the Food, Drug and Cosmetics Act. Two common tests performed on animals to determine the toxicity of a chemical are the LD50 and the Draize test.
Every 70 out of 100 animals are in testing labs world wide, and suffer every day in may ways inside the inhuman labs. As the tests are supposed to improve human product, there are many signs of animals cruelty, and mistreatment of the animals. After the tests are done the animals are killed because they have deforms, are sick, or have missing limbs due to the tests. All of animals are at risk during these procedures because of the products that are being used.. Although animal testing may help improve products that people use everyday,so no one can agree to the animal cruelty, deadly Procedures, and if the it is legal or illegal, all in the bettering of people’s ,and the animal’s lives.
constructive speech Animals can be used in lab experiment . First of all, Animal Experiment Provides a Platform for Medical Research: Now we manage to treat diseases like measles, smallpox, malaria today which are all horrible disease only because of animal experiment. The California Biomedical Research Association states that nearly every medical breakthrough in the last 100 years has resulted directly from research using animals. Without these experiment, we may even not have the chance standing here to make this debate! Secondly,Animals are appropriate research subjects because they are similar to human beings in many ways.
Throughout the history of mankind, humans have always been faced with death. Death can consist of anything from disease, virus, natural causes, as well as many other illnesses. The associations with animals and the processes of bodily functions with humans prove animals seem to be our closest and foremost option for medical testing. Many citizens feel animal testing is good and many feel it is bad, but there is a very fine line between right and wrong when animals are being used for scientific research. With human deaths constantly on the rise, animal testing should be used as our primary source for cures.