Andrew Carnegie's Intentions

552 Words3 Pages
Discuss why Carnegie should be called a “robber baron” or an industrialist. Think good Carnegie, bad Carnegie. The question regarding Andrew Carnegie’s intentions as an industrialist has been debated for decades. Many consider him an unfair “robber baron” who contributed only negative things to the country. Others, however, view Carnegie as an important industrialist who was the king of steel. In the grand scheme of things, Andrew Carnegie’s good deeds clearly outweigh the bad. He made good and efficient steel, became very involved in philanthropy, and created jobs for thousands of American people. Carnegie was not a “robber baron”, but rather a groundbreaking industrialist who set the standards for further industrialization in the United States. Andrew Carnegie’s involvement in steel is what made him a hero in the sense of industry. His company, Carnegie Steel Company, revolutionized steel production in the United States. He built steel plants all over the country using technology that would make production easier, faster, and much more productive. More plants created more jobs for people who were in need of work, so it seemed to be a win-win situation. Granted, Carnegie did not pay the workers gratuitous amounts of money on pay day, but his workers still made an income. More importantly, the jobs were completely voluntary. Many will argue that Carnegie treated his workers poorly and forced them to work for minimal wages, which is completely false. Carnegie did not force any of his employees to stay with the company. If someone had a problem with their amount of income, they could leave the position if they felt the need to do so. The workers came on their own will, and they could go on it as well. Carnegie became a very wealthy man working in the steel industry, but it was because of his long years of hard work that earned his money. Because
Open Document