Anderson Theory Critique

757 Words4 Pages
Theory Critique of Dr. Neil Anderson Nathaniel Grace Liberty University Author Note Nathaniel Grace, Department of Professional Counseling, Liberty University. Correspondence may be addressed to Nathaniel Grace, Post Office Box 212, Orono, Maine, 04473. E-mail: revngrace@hotmail.com Summary of Theory This theory critique analyzes the model presented by Neil Anderson in his book, “Bondage Breakers”. The author places significant focus upon the Holy Spirit as a vital partner in counselin. The concept of discipleship counseling is explained and compared with similar authors. The central significance of the Spirit of God, the Word of God and the Church of God is discussed with emphasis upon the Spirit of God. Connection is made between Anderson’s model and the concentric circles presented by Hawkins. A. Spiritual Wickedness The apostle Paul wrote to the church at Ephesus, “ For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places” (Ephesians 6:12, KJV). Accordingly, Anderson (1993) presents that Satan has an impact upon thoughts, feelings and relationships in the body of Christ. “bondage to various forms of Satanism and the occult” (Anderson, 1993, p. 11) Cloud and Townsend (1992) present that boundaries are a necessity and that the following are benefits achieved when boundaries are in place: 1. Partners are in a position to achieve biblical vision for relationship 2. Reward of achieving fullness as a person as well as a person in a relationship 3. A celebration of oneness 4. The commitment of resources to the healthy and balance experience of an “us-ness” or “wellness” 5. The creation of a Godly
Open Document