Analyzing Hamlet As a Human Being

260 Words2 Pages
The limitations of analyzing a character in a play as if he or she was a real person are our personal perception and or interpretation. When we use our personal opinions or morals to analyze a character it causes us to be bias or have a favorable opinion of a character which can interfere with facts from a story “each critic describes a Hamlet who corresponds to something in himself” (Garber). With Hamlet readers become empathetic to his situation at home and either agree or will disagree with him wanting to seek revenge on his parents. The problem with empathy is it causes biases. Readers are only aware of what is presently occurring in the story and what Shakespeare wanted us to know. There are limited facts which tell about how the Hamlet’s kingdom was prior to the murder and marriage. We are not aware of the condition of the relationship between Hamlet’s father and mother were before he was murdered and between his father and Uncle Claudius. Readers are set up to only be aware of the present dysfunction and separation in the kingdom. Trying not to analyze Hamlets character figuratively would be challenging. Hamlet has multiple soliloquys in the play which create many different interpretations on his character. Since Shakespeare gave Hamlet these detailed and emotion filled speeches which are meant to display his inner thoughts (but it was only made for theatrical purposes) it makes it difficult to not analyze Hamlet as a real person, it is because his speeches invoke feelings within

More about Analyzing Hamlet As a Human Being

Open Document