Turtle gets blamed for the bombings but Turtle really knows who the real bomber is. When they get the time to say who the murderer of Sam Westing all of them are wrong. In the end of the book Sandy, Turtle best friend dies of running out of medicine. Also they find out that Sam Westing wasn’t murdered after all. Turtle has a trial about it and she finds out that Sam Westing was Sandy all the time.
The first one is the portrait of Rebecca, a typical the femme fatale. Rebecca was the dead first wife of Maxim de Winter. Although Rebecca never appeared in the film, from the conversations between the heroin and other people, it seemed that Rebecca was a perfect wife that Maxim de Winter loved deeply. However, the truth is on the contrary. Maxim de Winter hates his wife very much as she was a profligate woman.
But why? That is the question that everybody is now asking himself? As most of the people, I have decided to choose my side. With further look at the murders, I have found out that there is an awful lot of chance that George is the murderer. But there is also the possibility that it’s Curley because he did not want his wife to go away so he killed both of the
(Brown 2) Then August 4, 1944 someone tipped off the police and the Frank’s, Van Daan’s, and Mr. Dussel were all sentenced to attend the Bergen-Belson concentration camp in Germany. (Brown 2) Anne’s sister, Margot, was the first of both the families to die. (Gale 3) She died of a typhus epidemic that broke out in the camp. (Brown 2) Anne was never informed that her sister had died, but she had a feeling something was wrong. (Brown 2) Ernst Schnabel, on the topic of Anne Frank, wrote: “She sensed it, and soon afterwards she died, peacefully, feeling that nothing bad was happening to her.” (Brown 2) The epidemic killed around 17,000 prisoners.
When the woman learns it is her son he murdered she still hides the murderer because of their shared race. After speaking with many more African Americans about the story Larsen concludes it is so well known it is practically folklore. Larsen claims she has never read “Mrs. Adis” and any similarities are just coincidence, hinting that the story was not owned, but “communal racial property (Hoeller 424).” After examining her defense, researching her rough drafts and holding an interview with Larsen the editors concluded that the similarities were an “ ‘extraordinary coincidence (Hoeller 83; Larson 422 & 424).’ ” The story “Mrs. Adis” by Kaye-Smith followed the same plotline set in Britain, following the British lower social classes (Larson 88).
Romeo finds out she is “dead” and comes to see her. This then leads to both their suicides. This is also evident in Douglas Dupler’s essay when he writes “ In the end, rather than mediating his position of religious authority, the friar devises a secretive plan that goes wrong and leads to the death of the young lovers,” (Dupler 3). It is explained in this essay that Friar Lawrence goes against his beliefs and concocts the plan that then fails. In summary, Friar Lawrence is the one responsible for Romeo and Juliet’s deaths.
An example of why i felt the way i did is when Gatsby is in the passenger seat, and Daisy runs over Tom’s secrect lover, Myrtle, killing her. Gatsby is willing to take the blame for her “Of course I’ll say I was [driving],” he tells Nick. Yet despite of being outside her window all night long, he never gets so much as a thank you from her. In fact, he gets killed for that very thing he takes a blame for, when Mr. Wilson takes his revenge by killing Gatsby she doesn't even attend his funeral. This was the man who, days earlier, she “loved.” She and Tom leave town, retreating into their “vast carelessness” and heading to “wherever rich people go to be together,” according to Nick’s bitter
“The girl is not surprised to later learn that her father has recaptured and killed the mare” (Korb). As we can see we have a similarity between both characters, the misfit and the father commit murders. In a typical story the reader is always going to be given a climax. In “A Good Man is Hard to Find” the climax of the story is of course at the end, when the Misfit
Dear Prince, I beg of thee to drop or even minimize the charges towards Romeo Montague. Please do this task I ask you because even though Romeo killed Tybalt, it was out of revenge considering Tybalt was the one that killed. Tybalt also wanted to fight with Romeo, so Tybalt started this whole thing. The two families always hated each other, so it’s not like Romeo did it for no reason. I believe Romeo killed Tybalt because Tybalt was the killer of his best friend Mercutio.
So they accuse and convict (by bribery) an innocent bystander (Davy,a seamstresses’ son) of attempted murder because he apparently “obstructed the vehicle and caused the accident” and his sentence is death but a portion of his body will be used to save Acudo. Now here is where our favorite anti-hero is given the big decision of; taking an innocent life and helping someone who will only do more harm than good OR let the troublemaker pass and have on his conscious that an innocent person is dead because of him……but being the genius that black jack is he thinks of an off the wall solution of, simply switching the faces by putting Davy’s face on Acudo’s dead body and vice versa, therefore fooling Mr. Wealthy Billionaire into thinking it’s his beloved son and still getting paid. After the bandages come off a couple months later after the surgery, he’s elated that his “son” is okay but the first chance he gets he escapes the hospital and returns to his with the money that black jack gave him.