Analytical Analysis Women Don’t Ask

293 Words2 Pages
In the informative introduction of Women Don’t Ask, by Linda Babcock & Sara Laschever the writer provides a comprehensive summary of the book, giving the reader a clear understanding of the details within. The content and structure of this analysis support the purpose to inform, and to increase the desire to read the book in its entirety. The writer provides a generous amount of evidence to raise awareness of the issue of gender inequalities pertaining to self-advocacy. The summary supports and clarifies the main purpose of the book as an analysis of the deeply, embedded cultural beliefs that encompass the reluctance of woman in asking for what they want, or what they need. I interpret the stance of the writer to be strong, objective, neutral and fair. This approach is necessary in presenting information that has been validated by research. A nonbiased viewpoint leads the reader to think about the issue objectively and consider the realities of gender inequality, as it relates to personal experiences, in a productive way. A critical, argumentative or opinionated approach would not be appropriate in presenting evidence based facts or in relaying such a sensitive topic. Attitudes such as these would discredit the writer and misrepresent the facts. There is no reason for the author to write persuasively because the information is persuasion enough. The intended audience of the introduction is concurrent with the book. While the primary focus is women, the intended audience can be interpreted as society as a whole. This becomes clear when the author states the fundamental purpose of the book is “to provoke social change on a larger scale by inspiring everyone--in the workforce and at home--to think differently about how women can and should behave” (Babcock and Laschever

More about Analytical Analysis Women Don’t Ask

Open Document