Analysis of a Systematic Review

1049 Words5 Pages
Analysis of a Systematic Review: Leadership Practices and Staff Nurses Intent to Stay Analysis of a Systematic Review: Leadership Practices and Staff Nurses Intent to Stay With a greater emphasis on evidenced-based practice, staff nurses must investigate current and up-to-date information. One way to accomplish this is through a systematic review of the literature. Conducting a systematic review is beneficial to the reviewer as well as other nurses who do not have the time to conduct a review. Systematic reviews are conducted step-by-step to ensure unbiased and thorough synthesize of the literature. In this paper I will identify the key elements in the article Leadership Practices and Staff Nurses’ Intent to Stay: A Systematic Review (2011) and its potential on clinical practice. Key Elements Leadership practices can have a great effect on staff satisfaction and motivation in the work place. The looming threat of a future nursing shortage can have a direct effect on patient care, work place culture, and ultimately the decision to remain in a job. Leadership must be vigilant in retention efforts to keep nurses in the work place. This systematic review aims to gather information describing leadership techniques that have a positive effect on staff nurses decision to stay in the work place (Cowden, Cummings, & Profetto-McGrath, 2011). The Problem The first step in a systematic review is stating a specific problem or research question that the reviewer is investigating. This step is critical in focusing the review to answer a specific research question. The specificity of the research question “also saves other scientists…the time to obtain and evaluate these studies themselves” (Rew, 2010). In this systematic review the reviewers “focused on why staff nurses stay in their current positions rather than why they leave” and the influence

More about Analysis of a Systematic Review

Open Document