Memo To: Chip & Charles Carroway, Carroway Clothing Limited (CCL) From: Date: Re: Current accounting issues, employment benefits and financing options. Thank you for the opportunity to address the current accounting issues, employment benefits and financing options facing Carroway Clothing Limited (CCL) 1. SR& ED and Development costs treatment: In reviewing the financial statements it appears that the development costs and SR&ED treatment may not have been recorded appropriately. The SR&ED are tax credits to be used towards taxable income and should not have been recorded as government grants. Since CCL may not have needed them in the initial years, it can use SR&ED tax credits against taxable income
a. They are recorded at cost and adjusted for inflation. b. They are recorded at market value for financial reporting because historical cost is arbitrary. c. Accounting principles require that companies report assets on the income statement.
2. Participation Rights Contractual rights of security holders to receive dividends or returns from the security issuer’s profits, cash flows, or returns on investments. 3. Preferred Stock A security that has preferential rights compared to common stock. C. What information about securities must companies disclose?
An entity changes its depreciation method for production equipment from straight-line to a units-of-production method based on hours of utilization. The auditor concurs with the change, although it has a material effect on the comparability of the entity’s financial statements. 6. An entity discloses certain lease obligations in the notes to the financial statements. The auditor believes that the failure to capitalize these leases is a departure from generally accepted accounting principles.
What is the citation and title? How does the Revenue Ruling evaluate the George case? 8. Use CCH IntelliConnect Citator to answer the following questions: v. Find the discontinued Miscellaneous MS 347; 1950- 1 CB 281 ruling ( Hint: use CB citation to find it). What is its current standing and why?
On the other side, for the entity, hiring the same firm as both consultant and auditor can save it audit expense, since the CPA or CPA firm has already known a lot about it when performing consulting, thus decreasing its audit hours. For example, in the case, after receiving the copy of SAS No.50 report, E&Y did not perform any meaningful separate analysis in deciding
Case 10-1 SolvGen Inc. Direct Drugs Inc. (Direct) is planning to acquire SolvGen Inc. (SolvGen or the Company), a publicly owned company, during the fourth quarter of fiscal year ending December 31, 2010. Direct has engaged our audit engagement team to perform due diligence procedures, with an emphasis on the review of two separate material agreements: (1) a research and development agreement and (2) a license and distribution agreement, both executed by SolvGen during the first quarter of fiscal year 2010. Direct’s management provided the engagement team with the following memo describing the Company’s revenue recognition policy: M EMO To: Audit Engagement Team From: CFO, SolvGen Inc. Subject: Revenue Recognition for Research and Development and License and Distribution Agreements Date: November 30, 2010 SolvGen Inc. (the Company), an SEC registrant, is a pharmaceutical development company. SolvGen entered into a five-year research and development agreement with Careway Pharma Inc. (Careway) on January 1, 2010.
1. Explain giving reasons, whether they are likely to succeed in a legal action based on negligent misstatement. It is likely that the club members affected would succeed in a legal action based on negligent misstatement. This is due to a few factors 1. Enrico led them to believe that he was a qualified accountant and financial adviser when he was still only studying his Diploma in accounting.
Furthermore, his calculation of full unit cost, which only added up material cost and direct labor cost, is not that convincing. Probably the manager of the company would also take the other costs such as state tax and inspection cost into consideration when evaluating the whole project. Thus, the result of the inventory holding cost using the formula H=iC could not have the accurate number for the estimation. 3. The relationship Lynn Rosen was talking about was the relationship between customer-service level and inventory investment.
In this situation, the company failed to report the write-off of uncollectible receivables and ignored discounts on outstanding receivables for large customers who were struggling to sell Leslie Fay’s products. With regards to the inventory account, Leslie Fay had been known within the industry to be behind the times with the latest fashion. Because of this, it would be reasonable to expect the company to report significant write-offs of inventory for items they were not able to sell, however, the inventory account actually increased over the examined time period. Accounts