Alternative Dispute Resolution Clause For Learning Team

359 Words2 Pages
Running head: Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Clause for Learning Team Alternative Dispute Resolution Clause for Learning Team Eugenia G. Odvina University of Phoenix Business Law Law/531 Mr. Anthony Ellis September 22, 2009 Alternative Dispute Resolution Clause for Learning Team Introduction The individuals who comprises the learning team were expected to work together to meet/accomplished their desired goal. But sometimes, because of differences in terms of personalities, viewpoints/opinions, and others it creates dispute among the Learning Team members. If this occurs, expect the lowest level to handle this within the Learning Team itself. For instance if, the conflict cannot be settled in a civil, and timely manner, they can use the Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) to help them solve, and to bring the conflict to an end. The main purpose of the Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) is to solve quickly any dispute, eliminate stress on the other members of the group. To have a flexible compromise decision that will promote and reflect consensus between the team members involved. Mediation If the dispute will not be settled, a neutral third party, or a mediator will be asked to mediate the situation. With mediation, those team members who are involved were given a chance together to talk face to face about their disagreements, with the mediator working to help the two members communicate so that they can formulate a possible solution. No one has the power to impose a solution with mediation – rather they must work out their own agreement voluntarily. Mediation is quick, confidential, and effective the majority of the time. (Warner & Leonard, 2007, p. 8). Conclusion In order for the Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) process to become effective all members of the team should have an open mind and be willing to accept

More about Alternative Dispute Resolution Clause For Learning Team

Open Document