By using strategy, the sniper figures out a way to fool the enemy and kills him. Saving his life by taking out another, felt so bad. With guilt, and loss of lust for the war, the sniper became curious of the identity he had killed. The climax of the whole story happens at the very end when the sniper finds out he killed his own brother. Though, the story’s ending is ironic due to the sniper recognizing that the enemy killed was his brother.
Euthyphro remarks that it does not matter who was murdered, only if the murdered man has been “justly slain.” He believes that his father has committed an act which “pollutes” his family, and the only way he can “cleanse” his family is bringing his father to court (para. 33). The man who was murdered was a hired hand of Euthyphro’s, who, in “a fit of drunken passion,” killed
Julius Caesar Persuasive Essay In the book Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, the character Brutus helps his friend Cassius in killing Julius Caesar. When he does, many people think of him as a horrible person. Mark Antony, one of Caesar’s close friends, tries to get Brutus killed because he helped in Caesar’s murder. Then, Brutus starts to feel uneasy about the murder, and then he sees Caesar’s ghost the night before a big battle. He tries to persuade himself that it was just his imagination, and he then heads off to Philippi the morning after for the big battle.
Activity 1 Derrick Bird committed Mass Murder through Cumbria on 2nd June 2010. From the evidence it seems as if the reason for this spree was money related, his father had recently deceased and he wanted everything in his will killing his brother and his lawyer. He was also going through a tax investigation at the time. His motive seems to be personal at first mixed with financial and then turns into a mental disturbance as he kills those at random. His first 3 victims experienced high levels of risk as he specifically targeted them and the rest were of low risk as they had not done wrong or even know Bird.
As illustrated in Out of this Furnace, proper operation of the blast furnaces was an impending life or death matter. Unfortunately, for the characters of Kracha’s best friend, Dubik, and Mike, their livelihood depended on the factory and the factory ultimately ended their life as well. “Dubik died two days after a blast furnace explosion blind and unconscious,” (pg.53). The explosion was later deemed an “accident”; however, Kracha explained, “In a larger sense, it was the result of greed, and part of the education of the American steel industry” (pg. 54).
In the novel, Montag made Mildred friends cry. After he made her friends cry from telling them the truth they all left hurt. However, in the movie John almost killed a man because he thought the man killed his son. John felt bad at the end, because he was not looking at his son’s killer. Even though, he didn’t kill the man, he still hurt him physically and emotionally.
Although Grant initially doesn’t want to help Jefferson, he gradually changes throughout this book and accomplishes his goal of transforming him into a man. Jefferson, who was supposed to be meeting up with a friend to go fishing, ended up being convicted of murder. He was too ignorant to know that it was a bad idea to get into the vehicle with them and and ended up being accused of murder. Jefferson’s defense attorney defends him by calling him a hog. He says that Jefferson should not have been convicted of anything but stupidity.
In the beginning we learn that Huck sells his six thousand dollar fortune to Judge Thatcher for one dollar to make sure his father will never get it. Pretty smart for a 12 year old boy. Pap threatens to beat Huck senseless if he doesn't get some money. As soon as Huck gives his father a couple of bucks, Pap drinks it all away. “...I’d borrow two or three dollars off the judge for him, to keep from getting a cowhiding” (pg.27) In Paps case, two of the flaws lie directly within him.
Times, was about the recent incident with Christopher Doerner, a former officer of the Los Angeles Police Department who publicly released a manifesto vowing to get his revenge on the corrupt and unjust members of the department that he served for and with. Doerner ended up killing himself days later when he was surrounded and about to be apprehended. The issue discussed was that several agencies with in Los Angeles County offered a reward for the capture or capture and conviction of Doerner. Those same agencies are said to be withdrawing the reward because, as they see it, he was neither captured nor convicted, therefore no reward should be paid, not even to the couple he had hostage for a few days before his suicide. The writer disagrees with these actions, and explains that this will negatively affect the motivation for the citizens to report or become involved in large cases.
Many years go if you were a farmer on trial, the jury would be full of all farmers. But it isn’t like that anymore because judges and attorneys oppose biased people. That’s why some attorneys can ask the judge to excuse a juror for cause because they think the juror may be against their client. In the film twelve angry men, the jurors were somewhat biased, discriminating because of his race, his background, and one of the jurors even discriminated against him because of the troubled relationship he had with his own son. Citizens were thrown together into a hot, humid room to determine the guilt or innocence of a boy accused of killing his father in a moment of rage.