Payne stated that students should learn the “hidden rules” of the middle class from their educators so that they have another set of rules to use if they choose to do so. Impoverished students, compared to students of middle or upper class, often have a lack of proper funding, thus, a lack of appropriate resources to use in their education. Due to this, they are often unprepared for school, not having the money to purchase books and other educational tools. Both authors realize this, but argue that the responsibility lies on different shoulders. Payne states that impoverished students face inequality at school, insinuating that the school should be responsible for helping to provide for these students so that they can have a better education.
Licensing is supposed to create a boundary in separating people who know how to do the job from people who do not. Young (2002) argues that occupational licensing has many flaws. He stated that it raises prices and does not prove concretely that having a license insures better quality or safety. Also, the requirements usually do not insure “good practice.” The law places more attention to non-licensed practitioners than licensed practitioners who malpractice. Occupational Licensing requires schooling, courses, training, and other obstacles in order for people to practice their specialty.
There is also the need for training and the interviewer needs to have a background into education increasing the cost. As a result a small sample will be studied in comparison to other methods like questionnaires. This means that it will not be representative so cannot be generalised to different pupil subcultures. Willis’ qualitative methods enable him to find out about working class pupils resisting attempts to indoctrinate them in school. Theses ‘lads’ formed a counter school subculture that was opposed to school and showed this by flouting school rules for example truanting.
The New Right also believes that a successful school will gather sufficient momentum to build on its successes. They also see the major role of education is the development of skills and knowledge required to compete in the outside market. They believe that schools should be managed in the same way as businesses However, some theorists such as Chubb and Moe would argue that American state education has failed and they make the case for opening it up to new marker forces of supply and demand. They claim that disadvantaged groups (lower classes, ethnic minorities ect) have been badly served by state education due to the failure to create equal opportunity. Theyâd argue that state education is inefficient because it fails to produce pupils with the skills needed by the economy and
Then that would have hurt the economy on exporting also. Colonization in a concept is not a wonderful thing because one is taking over and deleting their culture and it requires a war. However, as of result it was beneficial to Argentina. It is not like Argentineans have been treated as slaves of Europeans like they did to Africa where the economy could not grow, but Argentina was more like new Europe in South America because many Europeans have immigrated and found new home there. Spanish and other Europeans developed and grew the country not stopping and torturing the country's progress.
Critical Essay II November 14, 2012 All Men Are Created Equal? * Though it’s hard for people in our country to come to terms with inequality, inequality still exists but much is much different than it was fifty years ago. There are many aspects of inequality; from gender to socioeconomic, if some one is different from what is deemed by the American society to “normal”, they will be treated as so and it will not be subtle. What is slowly becoming visible in terms of inequality and injustice, is the fact that it is harder for individuals among different gender groups, social classes and of those with different races to live an easy life in today’s society. And racism is no longer between the typical “white and black” race.
Comparing Mexico, Mexico itself had inner conflicts; they did not just immigrate to USA because of unemployment, but other reasons such as education, poverty. Even the film Bienvenido! demonstrates how Latin American countries contain internal problems in education. The primary schools would rather focus on distributing resources to “promising” students, which is extremely discriminatory. All students have equal rights, but they do not get the chance.
Of course there could be more structure which would cause gangs to be less damaging to our culture but the original idea behind it is a good one. We have things like Boys and Girls Club or after school programs to keep children busy and out of trouble, but those seem to be for youth whose parents and families are involved in their lives and play an active role in the decisions they make. Other children don’t have that starting at a very young age so they become independent and think they can do things on their own. That is the idea behind a gang. It is a group of individuals that want to find their place but have no direction to guide them.
The government controls everything dealing with education. They came up with a system to help support the migrant children but it is still mainly about money when it comes down to it. What Han is also referring to in the government that they have hidden cost in the school system which is a burden on migrant workers and their families. Like for migrant schools they get money from the migrant workers and not the help of the government. Education is one of the biggest problems that migrant workers face because they are considered low class.
But the most important reason why I wouldn’t live in Puerto Rico is the jobs are bad and the schooling is different. The schools in Puerto Rico are different from here and Florida because its open school and you can come in and out as much you want and if a teacher don’t go to work you don’t