The guard of federalism is shown one way in the Constitution when they set up the compound government to make sure that the federal government doesn’t get too much power. The second way is when some responsibilities are given to the state government so that they can share the power equally. Federalism protects against tyranny because it ensures that the federal government doesn’t have too much to say in what happens in the country so that they don’t become too powerful and create tyranny. The second guard against tyranny was the separation of powers which means that the government is separated into separate branches so that they can spread out the power so that one branch of the government can have more pull in what happen in the decisions made
Benton Hurt Ms. Dean AP Government 5 September 2012 Federalist vs. Antifederalist Paper These two papers focus on the powers and abilities of the federal government. In the Federalist #31, Alexander Hamilton presents truths about mathematics and politics concerning the need for the national government to have taxing authority. In the Brutus V essay, Brutus complains that the powers given to the general government in the first article of the Constitution give it unlimited power. Hamilton, a federalist, says that the federal government will have no power without the ability to tax, and Brutus says it will have too much power. In the Federalist #31, Hamilton explains that the government must have full power to execute its responsibilities, and that one of its responsibilities is to protect the nation.
With the foundation of a federal government, that government can regulate and maintain both domestic and international trade without individual state interference, therefore making the United States one of the most important trading countries in the western world. This is only one possible explanation, another might be that they honestly did purely want to build a government for the people of the United States and by the people, which is supported by Paul Johnson’s writings. Other debates between intentions lie behind the injection of United States into the Vietnam conflict. Some historians say that the reason for our entrance into the conflict was to protect democracy and stop the spread of communism. Others say that the U.S. involvement wasn’t to protect democracy but to protect our economic interests in the nearby South Pacific and Middle East.
He believed that the Constitution gave the federal government opportunities to do whatever was “necessary and proper” as in a national bank. Jefferson on the other hand was an anti-federalist. He believed in a “strict” interpretation of the Constitution. If the Constitution didn’t give abstract power on something, it was up
President Woodrow Wilson wrote “the he Constitution of the United States is not a mere lawyers’ document, it is a vehicle of life and its spirit is always the spirit of the age.” One must keep this fact in mind when comparing the Constitution and the Articles of Confederation. There was a vast difference in the “spirit of the age” when these documents were drafted. Coming on the heels of the Declaration of Independence and the war against England, and afraid of a dictatorship or a government that did not listen to its people, the Articles of Confederation (which will be referred to as AoC) were written it a way that gave more power to the states. The problem with this type of government was that it was too difficult to enact or enforce laws and the government could not collect enough taxes to support itself. I believe the Constitution did a better job of protecting liberties, specifically in the areas of the federal court system, representation of the people, and the levy of taxes.
At the time, the states feared a strong central government, for this reason, the Continental Congress tried to give the states as much independence as possible. After the ratification of the Articles of Confederation the states pretty much governed themselves, they regulated their own interstate trade, they raised their own militia, and the Sovereignty resided in the
The Federalists were usually characterized as loose constructionists, which meant they focused more on the intent of the constitution and its framers, and believed that changes were necessary for the development of the nation. Although Republicans and Federalists were characterized as having these particular views towards the enactment of the Constitution, when Jefferson and Madison served as Presidents during the beginning of the 19th century from 1800 to 1817, it was proven that even though they seemed to believe in their own views, in reality when time came, they started changing their beliefs and becoming both strict and loose constructionists for the good of the nation, which was strongly advocated by Henry Clay and his American System. The same would occur for the Federalists, so generally, each side did not accurately characterize itself during the early 19th century and proved each side had its similar interest when interpreting the Constitution. Before Jefferson became President in 1800, The Federalists dominated national politics for the first decade of America’s governmental history because of George Washington and John Adams favoring Federalist views. It was not until the
While Madison supported a strong central government, he also helped implement what are common separations of power and checks and balances. Originally a Federalist and author of many of the Federalist Papers along with colleagues such as John Jay and Alexander Hamilton, Madison was not only a scholar but a statesman that saw the dangers of a hard, ridged stance for federal government. Madison feared the likelihood of each state in the Confederacy having its own monetary systems and laws. He feared that bankruptcy from one state might seep to the next with a catastrophic result. He held a firm stance against treason and sedition.
Explain Congress’ ‘power of the purse’. (10 marks) The Power of the Purse is the power granted to Congress to direct the flow of funds requested from Executive officials due to their right to do so granted from the Constitution. This power is granted under Article I Section 9 of the constitution and was granted to avoid ‘executive tyranny’ that was widely seen during the reign of the British. Following the 1930’s and the Roosevelt New Deal, what was intended to be the most prominent branch of government took to the second rudder to be replaced by an executive growing in power and importance. Thus it became ever more essential for Congress to exercise its power of the purse as new programmes were set up for the next 50 years.
The doctrine under which legislative and executive actions are subject to review Marbury vs Madison Case- A landmark case[->11] in United States law[->12] and in the history of law worldwide. It formed the basis for the exercise of judicial review in the United States[->13] under Article III[->14] of the Constitution[->15]. What is a Unitary System of Gov? McCulock vs Maryland Case- A landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States[->16]. The state of Maryland[->17] had attempted to impede operation of a branch of the Second Bank of the United States[->18] by imposing a tax[->19] on all notes[->20] of banks not chartered in Maryland.