Issues like the role of the government, the people’s rights, and international affairs were some of the more major aspects that prompted the evolution of the first American political party system. The administration of Washington and Adam’s dueled it out with their contributions to the solving of these national problems in the midst of deciding whether such things as state power and people’s rights were dangerous to the state of the national government. After all these things forming throughout their legacy, factions known as the Jeffersonian and Hamiltonian transformed into political parties that gave opposing views on our nation. As the new American government began to form, because of the division between the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists, Washington realized there needed to be a President in charge who could balance the nation with power and release to the people. He stood for a strong federal government because he strongly struggled with giving states too much power, thinking they would start a rebellion in which could not be controlled.
The separation of powers is quite pivotal for the US government otherwise there tends to be some corruption relevant to the extreme utilization of powers. Those two points of view are states by James Madison while planning to set up the Constitution of the national government, and those opinions are all crucial to the development of
WHY DID CAESAR EMBARK ON CIVILWAR? Caesar found it necessary to cross the Rubicon for many reasons, most of all due to the new regulations set by Pompey in Rome. During Caesar_s campaign in Gaul, Pompey was the most powerful man in the government, and he intended to keep it that way. Lucan states, ” Caesar could no longer endure a superior, nor Pompey an equal.‘ After Crassus died, the triumvirate between these three men broke down and Pompey and Caesar became rivals. In 52 BC, Pompey became sole-consul, and passed legislations which affected Caesar_s position in power.
If I lived back in that time, and having just finished the war with Britain where we finally got our independence, I would remind people all the issues we had. Britain was trying to tell us what we needed to do and how we needed to do things without really knowing what our problems were here. How is this new Constitution which gives a lot of power to the national government different from having Britain tell us what we needed to do. I would think if I lived back then I would say we are going from one wrong to another and I would oppose the Constitution. The Anti-Federalists did not want to ratify the Constitution.
Founding Fathers with Opposing Views- Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson Everyone knows that our country was built on the basic principles of freedom. They are aware that the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution are the building blocks of our nations government. What most people are not aware of however is that two of our nations most prominent and important founders Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson, bitterly disagreed over the direction and fate of the country. They held opposing views on everything from how the Constitution should be interpreted and where the capitol of our country should be located to how our national monies should be handled. Their differing upbringing and different paths to political careers, made them see the colonies and their ‘natural’ rights in completely different ways.
While Madison supported a strong central government, he also helped implement what are common separations of power and checks and balances. Originally a Federalist and author of many of the Federalist Papers along with colleagues such as John Jay and Alexander Hamilton, Madison was not only a scholar but a statesman that saw the dangers of a hard, ridged stance for federal government. Madison feared the likelihood of each state in the Confederacy having its own monetary systems and laws. He feared that bankruptcy from one state might seep to the next with a catastrophic result. He held a firm stance against treason and sedition.
“… it seems to have been reserved to the people of this country, by their conduct and example, to decide the important question, whether societies of men are really capable or not of establishing good government from refection and choice, or whether they are forever destined to depend for their political constitution on accident and force.” A question posed by Hamilton in Federalist 1, but in my opinion it has been answered by many others such as Tocqueville, Gilman, Lippman, and within the Federalist Papers, Civil War, and the conflicts of Washington and Jefferson, though each has done so with a unique and different approach. The foundations of a true democracy and its expectations were set with the first election. George Washington delivered his first inaugural address in April, 1789 in which he expressed his expectations of the American government. He desired a centralized government for America that would serve to be an example for other nations for its morality and principles. A government that treats all with
The founding fathers used many concepts and ideas when writing the constitution and a lot came from John Locke. The constitution is the guideline to United States political culture and society. The Constitution is the supreme law of the United States. The beginning of the U.S Constitution establishes rules and separates the powers of government. Powers of government are separated into three main categories.
Some cause for concerns can be found in the first writing of the Constitution (the one that will soon be thoroughly discussed) and some lay in more recent Amendments. However, we must not forget that these voices can only be discussed out loud for all opinions to be made on it because of the foresight of those in our past that demanded such rights before approving the Constitution as the foundation of our new government. The Constitution that was written before the ratification debate was adequate in its democracy, but fell short of its goal of creating a government that incorporates all of the citizens views equally and effectively. The Constitution divides the power between the three government
The constitutional and federal law grants the executive branch all the power necessary to meet current and future challenges. The strength of the executive branch is leveraged against the strengths of the legislative and judicial branches of the federal government to ensure the equilibrium of power. It is this constitutional design that the Founding Fathers envisioned would protect the government from tyrannical rule in 1787, and is the same design that will continue to protect the United States throughout the complex challenges of the current strategic environment of the 21st century and