Agency of Necessity Essay

1764 Words8 Pages
Editorial Committee of the Cambridge Law Journal Principal and Agent. Agency of Necessity. Bona Fide Sale. Prager v. Blatspiel, Stamp &Heacock, Ltd. [1924] 93 L.J.R. 410 Author(s): H. St. D. N. Source: The Cambridge Law Journal, Vol. 2, No. 2 (1925), pp. 241-243 Published by: Cambridge University Press on behalf of Editorial Committee of the Cambridge Law Journal Stable URL: . Accessed: 27/01/2014 04:52 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact . Cambridge University Press and Editorial Committee of the Cambridge Law Journal are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Cambridge Law Journal. This content downloaded from on Mon, 27 Jan 2014 04:52:50 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Notes o?t Recenit Cases. 241 This was, indeed, as Bankes, L.J., said, " the only possible decision in this case." The points at issue had already been settled in previous cases: (1) The circumstances in which a company can be held to limit Spcnce liability on a passenger'sticket have been decided in Richlardson, & Co. v. Rowntree [1894] A.C. 217, and Hood v. Anchor Line, Ltd. [1918] A.C. 837.. (2) The point of time at which it is necessary to consider whether the deceased would have had a right of action has been determined by the Privy Council in British Columbia Electric Rly. Co., Ltd. v. Gentile [1914] A.C.

More about Agency of Necessity Essay

Open Document