Agency of Necessity Essay

1764 Words8 Pages
Editorial Committee of the Cambridge Law Journal Principal and Agent. Agency of Necessity. Bona Fide Sale. Prager v. Blatspiel, Stamp &Heacock, Ltd. [1924] 93 L.J.R. 410 Author(s): H. St. D. N. Source: The Cambridge Law Journal, Vol. 2, No. 2 (1925), pp. 241-243 Published by: Cambridge University Press on behalf of Editorial Committee of the Cambridge Law Journal Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4515085 . Accessed: 27/01/2014 04:52 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org. . Cambridge University Press and Editorial Committee of the Cambridge Law Journal are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Cambridge Law Journal. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 14.139.214.178 on Mon, 27 Jan 2014 04:52:50 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Notes o?t Recenit Cases. 241 This was, indeed, as Bankes, L.J., said, " the only possible decision in this case." The points at issue had already been settled in previous cases: (1) The circumstances in which a company can be held to limit Spcnce liability on a passenger'sticket have been decided in Richlardson, & Co. v. Rowntree [1894] A.C. 217, and Hood v. Anchor Line, Ltd. [1918] A.C. 837.. (2) The point of time at which it is necessary to consider whether the deceased would have had a right of action has been determined by the Privy Council in British Columbia Electric Rly. Co., Ltd. v. Gentile [1914] A.C.

More about Agency of Necessity Essay

Open Document