The criminals will not hesitate to bring harm or death. This is where owning and having a gun is mandatory. This law was design to keep gun away from criminals but it keep guns at least temporary from the law abiding citizen. This is just one of the many reasons I am against Gun control. The proponents for banning guns, and the defensive use of a gun, cannot show any proof of taking banning guns will slow the crime rate with tighter gun laws.
The reason for this is that in order to obtain a concealed weapon license, citizens must first take a class on gun safety, and learn the legalities concerning the use of lethal force. I highly agree with this particular law, only because its a smart idea to be educated on how to properly obtain a concealed weapon, rather than having no knowledge on how to even use the weapon and possibly putting someone's life in jeopardy. By teaching people proper gun safety fewer accidents will occur. Lott and Mustard stated: “allowing citizens to carry concealed weapons deters violent crimes, and it appears to produce no increase in accident deaths” (82). Gun control supporters can count some victories during the past year, including the gun-safety regulations in Massachusetts and the defeat of concealed weapons bill in several states.
“Reasonable gun control & education steps can be put in place, so an outright ban is unnecessary” (Joe Messerli, balancedpolitics.org). Though now in a world where they have become more dangerous and the criminal violence has risen, guns are what protect us from danger, help us survive with hunting for food and clothing and in some parts are vital to survival. We can come to agreement that guns are needed within society and while regulation is needed, that laws need to be changed and adapted to modern times. Although too much regulation can be over bearing and
POLS 107 Project 1 – Comparison Chart |Topics |Go-Getters |Democrat Party | |Gun Control | |Democrats support the right to bear arms, for| | |We as a people have to protect ourselves. Everyone does|all people, not just militia. | | |not have good intentions, and for this reason we need | | | |to be able to own a gun. We need to be able to protect | | | |ourselves from any dangers that may arise. | | | | | | |Education | |They support learning and in second chance | | |Education can carry a person a long way.
Smarter Vs. Stricter Gun Laws Thesis: The Second Amendment is stated to be “The right of the people to keep and bear arms”. Although people are pushing for stricter gun laws in hope to lower the crime rates, it had been proven that stricter gun laws will not decrease crime rates. Instead of making stricter gun laws and banning the use of certain guns, smarter gun laws would not only help decrease crime rates around the world but will also protect citizens’ Second Amendment rights. I.
Do not just get one to be jumping on the bandwagon just because “everyone else” is. In the article, Bob Terrell gives his view points on gun control. He himself says that he owns gun to keep him and his wife protected. But, he also believes in (3) “common-sense regulations on gun.” And when it comes to having assault weapons just laying aroud in the house is unacceptable. Bob Terrell supports his argument very well.
The statistics show that the fear of the public having guns makes it hard for criminals to know when to commit their crime. The fact of the matter is, you cannot stop all crime whether you'll low guns or not, but the goal is to lessen the crime rates and keep the public safe. When a citizen knows that a gun is by their side bin case they need to use it for protection it puts their mind at ease. Crime has dropped as the law has raised and there is a definite reason to that, and that is the criminals are just as scared of guns as we are. A crime prevention officer said “When you allow people to carry concealed handguns, you see changes in the behavior of criminals.
What are we as free public allowed and capable to do? There are many arguments throughout the country referring to the public owning personal protection in the form of a firearm. Though the dangers of weapons are apparent, we as free Americans have the constitutional right to possess a firearm. Many Americans do not believe that the general public should have access to firearms. The FBI has released information
Gun Control Research Project Aarron Locklin Lonestar College System Some Americans are convinced that more federal regulation of firearms is needed to reduce the number of homicides that are committed with guns and to ensure a safer, more civilized society. Others who support ownership of firearms proclaim that the right to bear arms is guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and that no increase in crime, no mass killing, nor any political murders should lead the nation to violate the Constitution and the individual rights it guarantees. They also say that knives and other instruments are used to kill people as well, and there is no talk of regulating or banning them. Both supporters and opponents of gun control
Therefore, gun control should not be enforced, because this country has a constitutional right to bear arms and gun control will not stop the violence in this great nation. This great country was born on trust and certain rights that have been given to the citizens. When the fore fathers wrote the Constitution and then the Bill of Rights, they thought that citizens should be able to protect themselves from criminals and other attacks. The men who founded this nation knew that guns would be important “to preserve liberty; it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms…” (Preface 1). He knew that the right to bear