Aftermath and In Flanders Field poetry comparison

633 Words3 Pages
In the Sassoon’s poem “Aftermath,” he explains war as something that can never be forgotten. The distasteful thought haunts everyone to the point where war completely takes over the human mind. He documented the war environment as something that was unbearable to live at. Waking up next to a fellow member and seeing their body decay was worrisome. The rats crawling everywhere because the environment was not clean and unsanitary was frightening to see. Sassoon wanted to know what went through the soldiers mind before an attack occurred The hard rain hitting the floor at night and waking up to the sunlight to do everything all over again proved that they didn’t know when war was going to over. Sassoon asks the reader what they remember and it is clear that can recall everything because war can never be forgotten, the impact was just that strong. He asks if they ever thought about war occurring again. Those who have died, he asks them to look down and say they will never forget. He asked those who survived to look up and say they never forget. This oath is symbolic because the author shows communication between the living and the dead. He wants those who have died to be honored and those who have survived he want them to be advocate to tell everyone what war was really like. Nothing should be sugar coded because many lives were lost and many individuals suffered a great deal and everyone should understand why. In McCrae’s poem “In Flanders Field” he explains life before and after war. There was once a time when they experience the feeling of love and the enjoyment of life, but now they lay dead looking back at the life they had to give up to fight in war. Those who have died have passed the torch to the next generation of soldiers. This proved that the peace treaty didn’t solve the problem and a new war would occur. The dead souls have high standards for those who

More about Aftermath and In Flanders Field poetry comparison

Open Document