Lastly, the amount of personal bankruptcies will be reduced. Many Americans file for bankruptcy because of their medical bills, if the rates go down and more people can afford coverage then it would make sense that the amount of bankruptcies would also go down. Even though the pros all help and seem great the cons to this policy also holds valid points. First, “18 million of the uninsured will be forced to go under Medicaid, while the rest will have to accept another government program. Even so, millions will remain uninsured,” (Pros and cons of Obama care June 29, 2012).
At first glance I was appalled at this, thinking of the hundreds of thousands of Americans that would be put out of work. But he later goes on to explain that within the next ten years or so somewhere around forty-two percent of these bureaucrats will retire. But even so, Giuliani wants to replace only half of those jobs creating a more streamlined and smarter government. Where I feel the greatest economic impact will be felt in this plan is the privatization of the excess jobs. Although; the cut in governmental jobs would give taxpayers a relief thus cutting governmental non-defense spending, the jobs and business investment created by the privatization will be a much larger gain for our
As statistics show, there has already been an increase in the cost of health care partially due to the shortage in health care practitioners and the need to offer higher reimbursement for treatments. If predictions are true, and there is a shortage of 125,000 physicians by the year 2025, the cost of health care will increase more rapidly. Because health care and therefore an individual’s life is considered priceless, there are demand shifters that often affect the demand curve of a health care product. As demonstrated in the example above, physician loyalties and experience are just two of the many types of demand shifters. This demand shifters can cause an even steeper rise in health care cost in the real world.
He also asked the congress for cash-strapped local governments to hire more teachers and firemen. This affected American teachers and firemen because they had better opportunities to pursue their careers. In March 2010 President Obama created a National health care reform system for uninsured Americans. This system allows them to buy into health care plans with added subsidies and tax incentives but it also prevents the insurance companies from denying coverage. Economist believes that this system will do nothing to control cost but the budget office believes the bill will reduce the cost over a ten-year period.
Head Start suffered a cut of more than $10 million for the Head Start program affected for the 2008 Fiscal Year. The 2008 funding cut to Head Start means that programs will experience a decline in federal support by 11% since 2002. Federal support for Head Start kept a pace with the rise of inflation during this period. The budget rose from $6.54 billion in the fiscal year of 2002 to $7.77 billion for the fiscal year 2008. If Head Start programs received their full allocated monies from the ACF’s proposed 2009 budget increase, then programs would still operate in a negative stage by $923 million.
The New York Times claimed that, “When immigrants do take jobs, they’re hard workers” (Preston and Connelly a1). Therefore, it greatly contributes to America’s retirement system. The presence of immigrants also contributes to America’s long term population growth, necessary to stabilize the overall retirement fund. The Springer Science and Business Media’s journal states that some other countries in the world suffer from the labor shortages and a demographic crunch, in which a very small number of workers will be expected to pay the retirement and health care for elderly people (Gold 409). The ratio of retired people to workers is expected to dramatically increase in the coming decades, which would result in significant changes in the Security System of America’s retirement money.
The Federal Government Health Programs Introduction The Federal Governments three health care programs; Medicare, Medicaid and CHIP (child health insurance program) are costing $2.0 trillion per year. These programs accounted for 21 percent of the federal budget in 2010, or $753 billion. The costs of these programs to the Federal Government are astounding and have a large impact on the National Debt. An overhaul of the government health care programs is needed to reduce the continued spending of billions of wastefully dollars. Thesis statement An analysis of the Federal Governments three health care programs reveal a challenging job ahead in order to overhaul the programs to bring about reduce
The number one cited concern for opponents concerns the initial investment costs of developing such a system. Given the status of the economy and the government’s financial problems, and an immediate investment of an estimated $634 billion and $1.5 trillion over 10 years, the United States simply cannot afford to implement a system in the immediate future (CATO, 2011). A lesser concern, but valid nonetheless, is the idea that government mandated healthcare will eliminate the private healthcare industry and reduce in a lack of incentive to pursue medical professions due to lower earnings and more government control (2011). The most significant concern is what role will politics play in government sponsored universal healthcare. With heated issues such as abortion, stem-cell research, and even assisted death, how can the government ensure medical policies do not change as fast as politicians in
The significant difference between the rates of health insurance cost increases and wage and inflation increases creates a problem in itself. Not only are there millions of people without health insurance, it is becoming more likely that they will not be able to afford to hold insurance policy. However, in a 2002 study it was found that only 30% of the uninsured were below federal poverty levels (Overview of the U.S. Health Care System). This means that despite the unsettling amounts of people in poverty without health insurance, there is also the issue of those who have the means to provide themselves and their families with health insurance and choose not to, only to be faced with crippling health bills should anything go wrong. Navigating and deciphering the complicated health insurance industry is too daunting and expensive a task to leave up to individuals, which is why in many cases, the United States government and private organizations have stepped in.
Going by the contemporary crisis in the Medicare program of America, Bozic (2011) dictates that the solution to the crisis will demand increase in the tax margin on the employees. In addition, doctors and physicians are more likely to face salary cuts to allow proper budgeting of the program. Furthermore, the increase in demand for Medicare will have an automatic upward shift in the cost of insurance. There is a link between the positive effects of Medicare and the Economic effects of the system. The existing economic effects presented by the rise in demand for Medicare occurred because of the rise in the number of aged individuals.