On the other hand, if your title does not lend itself to research, this may well indicate that it isn’t really suitable. In many projects, the title emerges as a result of a process of thinking and researching. You don’t need to fix the title immediately. Choose a title which you think will work and then do some initial research. If you start to find useful
Ethical issues: ethical concerns relate to the right of participants in research. An appropriate methodology is required when conducting research to endure those results and any conclusions drawn are: * Reliable * Valid * Authentic Authenticity – Research aims to add new knowledge and understanding either by: * Generating new data. * Interpreting or applying existing knowledge in a new way. Research is based on the principle that the researcher is a natural observer of a phenomenon and does not distort or alter the observations made of the natural world. Validity – validity depends on what the claims are made about a piece of research and how well the claims are supported by the evidence or result from the research.
Right to know criteria for excellence in research. (Correct) This right is a little more difficult to define. Because “excellence” has both objective and subjective criteria, personal preference may keep the list of criteria from being as specific as we would like. However, those who are doing evaluations should work to make the criteria as specific and clear as possible so people can make choices about how to shape their own work. Right for key people to be protected so that work is done effectively.
One could argue that evidence based practice bridges the gap between research and practice with its focus on outcomes. Pierson and Thomas (2012) see effective outcomes as deriving from a systematic, reasonable and thoughtful regard for the best evidence. Basing actions on what is available and using an approach that has the most effective outcome is often the rational for best practice and course of
As previously noted, these pertain to those who sponsor the research, those who collect the data, and those who offer them. The sponsors should ask for the study to be done to better the purpose of the organization, and not for any other self-serving reason. They should respect the confidentiality of the data obtained by the researcher, and not ask for the individual or group responses to be disclosed to them, or ask to see the questionnaires. They should have an open mind in accepting the results and recommendations in the report presented by the researchers.” (p.
When conducted honestly and thoroughly, the scientific method can and has provided valuable information about the world and the world’s people (Jackson, 2009). Though some people rely on other methods for gaining knowledge, scientists only accept knowledge gained through science to arrive at plausible truths (Jackson, 2009). Due in part to human error and the tendency of human nature to succumb to temptations to bias research, the results of the scientific method should be viewed with skepticism (Garzon, n.d.). The scientific method of seeking knowledge and finding truth must stay within the limits of scientific ability and allow for human fragility in order to be effective (Slick, 2012). References Garzon, F. (n.d.).
Data must objective and documentation thorough. Also experiment should be reproducible. In other words other scientists should be able to test the same hypothesis in the same way and come up with the same findings. A. What would you need in your study to draw a conclusion?
These side effects may affect one person but not another. This would be hard to study as you can not say it is exactly one thing, and then you would have to look at the extraneous variables which affect each problem. However, this could also be good as it is not really being reductionist in its own approach; it is looking at all the possible individual differences. If choosing a different approach, like cognitive, then it would still be difficult because you do not know what the person is thinking. You would have to rely on the patient giving you the information for it not is socially desirable or have demand characteristics.
By assuming, is to question things. For example how it works, why it works, and when it works. The next step should be research, by checking on the assumptions we should develop an answer. Talking to people that has expertise in what is being researched, can help with an answer. Finally by putting the assumptions and research together, there should be a good analysis to the decision.
As for the procedures in the article itself, there seems to be an over-reliance on anecdotal evidence, with the argument being supported with stories about one person or with hypothetical situation. There is a distinct lack of hard data, but as the author acknowledges that there is a need for more empirical research, this should not necessarily be taken against her. Furthermore, this article is a part of a mini-series dealing with this topic and