Acme Wichita Case Write-Up

4041 Words17 Pages
HIGH PERFORMANCE TEAMS Final Case Paper The Strategy That Wouldn’t Travel The Problem Statement: Jimenez did not have a clear understanding as to why the Wichita plant was successful. The roll-out strategy Jimenez employed in Lubbock was based on the assumptions that her success in Wichita directly resulted from her management techniques and consulting experience. In reality her methods ignored critical factors that spawned teamwork and collaborative problem solving at the employee level. Though the end result was inevitably a success, and happened on her watch, the challenges she experienced at the Lubbock plant directly illustrated her techniques were by no means true drivers behind the positive change experienced in Wichita. Furthering complications, CEO Daniels has now chosen Jimenez due to her success in Wichita, to roll the project out at multiple plants. The misguided understanding as to why Wichita was a success, with no clear budgeting or performance measures, unrealistic timelines, and no reward for success or consequence for failure at the plant level is sure to lead to serious complications. Pressure to meet Daniels expectations is encouraging Jimenez to continue pursuing the wrong solutions while she works under a tight deadline. The additional pressure of implementing a “one size fits all” system that is already underway company-wide, will likely result in Jimenez underperforming as future plant projects are rolled out, leading to her ultimate demise in the long run. Extend Timeframe and Shift Approach: Jimenez should shift her approach away from consulting techniques and teams headed by outside consultants. Instead she should take a more detailed internal look at the successes and failures facing each plant, and construct teams led by individuals who understand the organizational culture to inspire change from within. Analysis:

More about Acme Wichita Case Write-Up

Open Document