Account for the Demise of Kodak

1464 Words6 Pages
Q3: Account for the demise of Kodak? Was this inevitable? Kodak is one of the oldest companies on the photography market, established more than 100 years ago. Its cameras and films have become know all over the world for its innovations. Kodak’s strength was it brand which is recognizable and enabled creating new technologies. Kodak had been the world’s leading film provider with virtually no competitors and domain the consumer, professional, health film market. However, The Company lost their business, because they were not catching the trends of digital photo technology and they adapt wrong strategies of as the film industry fade. It can be categorized five reasons why Kodak falls: Complacency, losing Focus, ignoring Competitors, being short sighted, and not changing with the market Firstly, when the Japanese firm Fuji Photo Film Co released a 400-speed colour film that was 20% cheaper than Kodak’s at 1984 (Scribd.com 2012). Kodak’s response was that “we didn’t believe that the American public would buy another company’s film”. Kodak is so proud of their achievement that made the new entry nibbled their market share. When the late 1980s, It failed to establish market share and market leadership in the digital sector; Kodak did not recognize the new opportunity thought Kodak had developed a prototype of the digital camera in 1975 (Mendes 2005) . Moreover, Kodak did not realize that digital cameras would be a threat to their film industry and cameras they sold. Kodak used a razor-blade strategy: it sold cameras at a low cost, and film fuelled Kodak’s growth and profits. The business became heavily dependent on this highly profitable margin from film, Kodak did successful based this strategy, but it made Kodak have paid less attention to their equipment which is executives hoped, and would ensure continued survival and success. As early as 1981, Kodak still

More about Account for the Demise of Kodak

Open Document