In psychology literature, self-forgiveness is defined as “a willingness to abandon self-resentment in the face of one’s own acknowledged objective wrong, while fostering compassion, generosity, and love toward oneself” (Enright, 1996, p. 115). The research was stimulated on this topic by conducting a conceptual analysis of self-forgiveness, where self-forgiveness was defined and distinguished from interpersonal forgiveness and pseudo self-forgiveness. There were conditions by which self-forgiveness was identified and made available to conduct this research in a proper manner. There was a model describing the process involved in self-forgiveness following the perpetration of an interpersonal transgression, which outlines the proposed emotional, social-cognitive, and offense-related determinants of self-forgiveness. They were all described in full detail.
changing positions of individuals etc. HSC2003-Outcome 2- assist in minimising individuals pain or discomfort. 1. Describe how pain and discomfort may affect an INDIVIDUAL’S well-being and communication. Pain can effect individuals communication so it is therefore important to observe their behaviour for signs of pain.
Intervention Studies on Forgiveness: A Meta-Analysis Liberty University Summary The topic covered by this article is based on the effectiveness of forgiveness intervention done through clinical studies. The article consisted of various case studies and analysis reported by Thomas W. Baskin and Robert D. Enright. Throughout the study, the common purpose was to prove that forgiveness is effective. The offended must forgive the offender who created anger, resentment, anxiety, and psychological depression. “Forgiveness has been define as the willful giving up of resentment in the face of another’s (or others) considerable injustice and responding with beneficence to the offender even though the that offender has no right to the forgivers moral goodness” (Baskin & Enright, p. 80, 2004).
* What is a dual relationship and is it wrong? A dual relationship is when the helper has another role outside the confines of the helping relationship such as a friend or a business partner (Brammer & MacDonald, 2003). Compare and contrast the views of the articles in relation to the issues raised by the case study. Briefly discuss these views using appropriate referencing. Ethical boundaries are benchmarks for the behaviour of helpers in helping relationships.
Within the discussion there are specific suggestions for future research on comparison of Forgiveness therapy with other anger focused therapies. The recommendation is that the programs used should attempt to decrease or remove long standing resentment and they should be compared with those that highlight here and now anger management and behavior control. By doing this it would help in shedding light on whether the removal of resentment or control of someone would lead to affecting the behavior is the key to emotional health or not (Lin., 2004 et al,
Paleari, F. G., Regalia, C., & Fincham, F. D. (in press). Marital quality, forgiveness, empathy, and rumination: A longitudinal analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. Forgiveness Bibliography 5 Ristovski, A., & Wertheim, E. H. (in press). The effects of source of compensation and trait empathy on forgiveness and satisfaction with outcome in the criminal context.
Malpractice Identify some of the ways you will go about decreasing the chances of getting involved in a malpractice suit. Focus on your attitudes and actions that are likely to prevent you from malpractice actions. What guidance do the various codes of ethics provide for you in lessening a malpractice action? Duty to Warn and to Protect Assume you are counseling a client that you have serious concerns about with respect to either danger to self (suicidal person) or danger to other (violent person). Create a brief scenario and identify the salient legal, ethical, and clinical issues.
The article explains what Post-traumatic stress disorder is, the symptoms, risk factors, causes, complications, test and diagnosis, treatments and prevention. Although, this article generally explains the depth of PSTD one might experience or not, but it lacks psychological and scientific support and reasoning in describing its research. The academic sources used earlier in this paper emphasizes on the same topic of Post-traumatic stress disorder but leads the information of the disorder by focusing in strength about the history and natural factors associated towards it. The second non academic source is by; ‘Medicinenet.com’ which also explains the PTSD detailed aspect by showing various factor involved in this disorder just like our first non academic research. Both researches are applicable and strongly convey the background information related to PTSD.
Uncivil behaviors that are not addressed, may progress into threatening situations or result in temporary or permanent illness or injury. I am inclined to define incivility as behavior that does not comply with The Golden Rule, which essentially states either of the following: 1) Positive Form: One should treat others as one would like others to treat oneself. 2) Negative Form: One should not treat others in ways that one would not like to be treated. This concept can be explained from the perspective of: 1) Psychology: empathizing with others. 2) Philosophy: perceiving their neighbor as self.
In contrast, restorative justice involves self-censure of the offender, who accepts the harm done, takes responsibility, and expresses remorse. More precisely, whereas in retributive justice censure is a one-sided affair, in restorative justice censure is a collective effort shared between victim, offender, and community. In retributive justice, moral meaning is restored through assertion against the offender; in restorative justice, it is restored through consensus with the offender. The latter reflects what Hudson called, with reference to Habermas’ discourse ethics, a ‘‘dialogic’’ morality in restorative justice. It reflects a communitarian view of restorative justice that morality is essentially a social product of a shared community and interdependence.