Evidence Of The Oedipal Pattern

1889 Words8 Pages
The Oedipal Pattern According to Sigmund Freud the oedipal pattern occurs in three stages. The first being the child comes to identify with the parent of the same gender. In stage two the child becomes attracted to the parent or parent figure of the opposite gender and in stage three, due to the attraction in stage two, a conflict is caused for with the parent figure of the same gender. But upon further review of other texts in which the oedipal pattern is present, we start to see that it doesn’t always follow Freud’s theory. In fact, in Oedipus the King, the story of Adam and Eve, Beowulf, The Death of Arthur, and Othello we see that these three stages are somewhat followed according to Freud, but also differ in many ways. When first reading Oedipus the King, I thought that the father figure was Oedipus’ biological father King Laius and he was in conflict with him because of the attraction to his mother, King Laius’ wife, Queen Jocasta as in accordance with Freud’s three stages of the oedipal pattern. But in further review I realized that if the oedipal pattern was present in accordance to Freud’s theory then Oedipus’ adopted parents, Polybus and Merope, would have been the victims as they were the “parent figures” in his life. Freud states that, “in the Oedipus complex the libido was see n to be attached to the image of the parental figures” (28), but this was not the case with Oedipus. In retrospect, I realized that the father figure was in fact the Sphinx, as she had the object of desire which was access to the city of Thebes, the place where Oedipus decided to go to escape his fate. The conflict between Freud’s theory of the oedipal pattern and the actual oedipal pattern present in the story is although we would like to think that King Laius is the father (figure) of the story, Queen Jocoasta as the mother (figure) and his attraction to her is what
Open Document