Breakdown Of Relationships

1338 Words6 Pages
Critically consider two or more explanations relating to the break down of relationships (25 marks) Duck (1999) suggested that relationships breakdown due to common problems called risk factors. These included: Lack of skill - Some people lack social skills, so they have poor quality conversations and don't indicate interest very well. Duck (1991) argued the lack of social skills can be seen as a disinterest and lack of effort to maintain the relationship, so it breaks down. Demographic factors - Bentler and Newcomb (1988) found that marriages in older couples were more likely to succeed. Jaffe and Kanter (1989) found that couples from different backgrounds were more likely to divorce. Those from lower socio-economic backgrounds or broken homes also had more unstable relationships. Rule breaking - Argyle and Henderson (1984) found several universal rules of a friendship. Standing up for them in their absence, sharing news of success with him/her, giving emotional support and trust and confidence in each other. Argyle and Henderson (1986) found that breaking these rules caused relationships to breakdown. Cycles of negativity - Noller (1985) found that couples in a dissolving relationship are less sensitive to non-verbal signals. They may complain about each other, without actually paying attention to the other person's concerns. Lack of stimulation - Duck and Miell (1986) found sometimes one partner doesn't stimulate the other enough, this lead to the feeling of less mutual interests and the feeling of disinterest. A relationship that doesn't grow can lead to it ending. Rollie and Duck's (2006) relationship breakdown model consists of 6 phases; 1) Breakdown phase - One or both of the partners become dissatisfied/distressed. Realization of inequity can be the cause of the dissatisfaction. 2) Intra-psychic phase - The unsatisfied partner will begin to
Open Document