For a defendant faces several years in jail and possibly multiple charges they can look forward to a few of their sentences being dropped and a reduction in their sentencing. A plea bargain can also result in a defendant not having to go to jail which can in the long run decrease the inmate population in jails and prisons. The prosecution benefits the most from plea bargaining. By offering a plea to a criminal for admitting their guilt the prosecution can alter the sentencing of the defendant. If a defendant agrees to wave their rights to trial the courts are saved time and a critical amount of money which benefits the entire criminal justice system as a whole.
This helps to stop accidents because it removes distractions from a p-plate driver so they can focus solely on driving. Another danger P-plate drivers face while on the roads is their driving speed. If a driver is going too fast, they are not able to stop fast enough or pay enough attention while driving, which can cause accidents. The current p-plate laws are effective in reducing accidents through a drivers speed by introducing laws which limit p-plate drivers to the speed of 90km/h, as well as not allowing p-plate drivers to drive turbo or supercharged engines or have modifications in their engines. These p-plate laws are affective in reducing accidents on the road, because they reduce p-plate drivers to a low speed as well as slow cars.
Healthy risk-taking behavior is participating in activities that tend to have a positive impact on your development. Unhealthy risk-taking behaviors are those that are likely to result in harm-arrest, injury and death. One type of unhealthy risk-taking behavior is riding on a motorcycle and doing wheelies without a helmet. This behavior might contribute to injuries such as brain damage, if you fall off the bike, or let’s say you are doing a wheelie and you fall off, a car doesn’t see you and runs over you. You aren’t wearing any sort of protection
He was then arrested and taken to the Juvenile Delinquent Center for his outrageous behavior. The part that is even more unbelievable is that the parents were never notified. The whole time the arrest took place, Gault’s parents were at work. The police officer who arrested Gault made no effort whatsoever to inform the worried parents. Gault’s mom came home that day from work and could not find her son anywhere.
However, Douglas suggested causes of suicide included cries for help, revenge etc. Although, despite these differences, both quantitative and qualitative methods are advantageous in their own ways. Therefore it may be best to take Taylor’s method of triangulation to get a complete understanding of suicide. This is because if both qualitative and quantitative methods are used, you can gain a better understanding of both societies vulnerability and individuals vulnerability to suicide as quantitative methods focus more on the society, as official statistics are meant to be a whole picture. Whereas qualitative methods focus more on individual causes of suicide.
Another main reason is that even if a person was to be texting while driving most of the time he or she will not admit to it. This would cause for less evidence in a case where someone was injured in an accident. This source would be important to me in most of my essay in most of it. It has some good facts stated by a lawyer who is involved in lawsuits relating to car wrecks while texting and driving. The source states that a person texting while driving can be following the laws while texting and driving, and another person might be the cause of the wreck.
Once the spill occurred the economy face a drop in its growth. The chemical plant was placed on probation until the EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) could figure out a solution to this problem. Placing the company on probation put many employers on leave until the company started up again. According to Ap’s website “Virtually every restaurant was closed Saturday, unable to use water to prepare food, wash dishes or clean employees' hands. Meanwhile, hotels had emptied and foot traffic was down at many retail stores.” People were loosing money because of the spill.
After a long drive he was being chased by a police officer for speeding Jose didn’t want to stop so he kept on going. The chase was ended by a deadly car crash when Jose hit a tour bus going to Santa Fe. In the accident there were only three people pronounced dead at the site Jose Rodriguez, the driver of the bus, and Carmen Rodriguez. Maria received a phone call form Carmen’s husband stating, “Maria did Carmen arrive safe to your house because on the news there was a report about an accident a bus going to Santa Fe and a car with a drunken man.” “Well mijo Carmen has not
Then it would be where the person itself would not be incarcerated but given help to change the outcomes of their thought so that the risk of them committing a crime is lowered. Which I somewhat agree with them; however I know some people can use that to their advantage to commit something and get away with it without the possibility of getting incarcerated. According to "Criminologist Believes Violent Behavior Is Biological" (2013), " if bad brains do cause bad behavior, if brain dysfunction raises the odds that somebody will become a criminal offender — a violent offender — and if the causes of the brain dysfunction come relatively early in life ... should we fully hold that adult individual responsible?” (para. 7). It was explained that there could be plenty of factors that go on when it comes to this kind of behavior which may include birth complications or things that someone was exposed to at a young age that could cause such a reaction to the mindset of
I think this would be an effective deterrent for others who might consider drunk driving because they might not have been through the experience of alcohol yet, so don’t really know how to forget about the consequences unlike some of the individuals who have already forgotten about it, and only thinking about the good time alcohol provides. 5. No, the death penalty is not merited for drunk driving because although I would like to enforce it on all the drunk drivers in the world, it just doesn’t seem that reasonable. So, in my law, I came up with the idea to give them a warning of “death” so that they get very frightened. And I’d like to keep them alive so their mistake haunts them forever, and are constantly reminded of their consequences due to their actions…causing a family or loved one to feel such grief just because they wanted a fun night out and didn’t think anything bad would happen to them.