Kant says that people in business should act out of duty alone, not self-interest or desire to earn huge amounts of money. For example motivating bankers through huge bonuses would be wrong. Kant would also apply the categorical imperative, to derive the duty of a businessman. However, whether Kantian ethics is the best approach in comparison to theories such as utilitarianism is debatable. One issue surrounding business is the relationship of the business to the consumers.
Placing profits above people isn’t socially responsible but is rather sociopathic and a microcosm of the larger problem that entails the current Capitalistic system that is used across the world. Company Q, is displaying a common capitalistic mind-frame that many companies engage in wherein they would rather focus on lost revenues than assisting the less fortunate. It’s troubling that the company wouldn’t donate day-old products to a food bank. The company does offer some organic foods, and this could be conceived as socially conscious if the food is obtained from traceable sources that are environmentally friendly growers. This social responsible act is overshadowed by the company’s decision to leave the inner city areas because of alleged loss of profits.
ALL WK 1, DQ’s: WK 1, DQ 1: What is a business’s obligation to build an ethical culture and balance its desire for profit with ethical responsibilities to employees, customers, society, and the environment? Ethics is different from one person to the next, so it is imperative that business clearly define the norm for staff members and management. The decisions organizations make influence more than business partners, affiliates, culture, and others. It is important for organizations center of attention on maximizing shareholder revenue. Therefore, maximizing profit without causing destruction to the business culture can be a balancing act for most organizations.
Break Breaker Inc. to some extent obey with some legal rules, but failed to comply with principles of morality and community, contribute to the society by producing honest high quality services, and account the consequence of damaging their reputation. I think that Solomon’s argument is fairly accurate, but everyone’s views are different on this. Some actions may be acceptable to some but unacceptable to others. Ethics provides the bigger picture in the business life and it must be understood. In my opinion, nothing is more dangerous to a business than a bad public image caused by being unethical.
Suppose that Cornelius believes that Elliot is not a good hire for Pharma. Can he fire Elliot? Although Adams may have had the legal right to hire Elliot without the consent of the others, it was a morally wrong decision not to seek the consent of the other shareholding partners. As a privately held corporation which is small in size, the promotion of business efficiency is an objective best served by enabling the owners to arrange the organization of the enterprise as they choose unless such decisions are outside the scope of the partnership business which would make it impossible to
Rights theory, not astonishingly, thinks about with the means of rights, as well as basic human rights and property rights. One argument in rights theory is that property rights mustn't override human rights. From a CSR perspective, this may mean that whereas shareholders of a company have bound property rights, this doesn't provide them license to override the fundamental human rights of staff, area people members, and alternative stakeholders. O Deontological theory. Deontological theory deals with the idea that everybody, as well as company managers, incorporates an ethical duty to treat everybody else with respect, as well as listening and considering their wants.
In other words, Sandel describes it as the idea of encouraging the gifted to utilize their talents to reap rewards for the community as a whole. This is also a philosophy that I agree with, and once again it is a philosophy that shows how unjust these employers are to hire illegal workers. These employers are using their status and gifts to reap profits solely for themselves and their companies and certainly not to benefit these illegal immigrants as they are being exploited. The employers are certainly not working for the betterment of the least advantaged, which is once again evident in the fact that many of them don’t offer safety regulations or job benefits. While this is not the case for every single U.S. employer who hires illegal immigrants, I do strongly believe, supported by statistics, that these are the major reasons why most employers hire them.
Business ethics are also important because if the business lacksgood ethics, this can damage the business reputation and make it less appealing to stakeholdersand that will lead to profit loss affect the whole business. Ethics of business has been discussed by Peter Drucker (Drucker, 1986, p. 254) which he said “ The problem is one of moral values andmoral education, of the individual, of the family, of the school. But there neither is a separate ethics of business, nor is one needed”. Drucker’s interpretation of business ethics is that personal ethics and business ethics cannot be separated and he gave an example of businessmen shouldnot cheat, steal, lie, bribe, or take bribes. But nor should anyone else.
The company’s investment into the employee will also act as a motivator for the employee. This will in turn lead to greater overall performance. Hire Yourself or Outsource It is our opinion that outsourcing is not the route the company should pursue. This could be a costly option. Another possible disadvantage is the recruiter has no idea or feel for the company and its culture.
CREATING SHARED VALUE Is CSV an attempt to legitimize bad business practices? According to the article “Contesting the Value of creating shared value”, in Michael Porter point of view, “CSV compliances with the law and ethical standards, as well as mitigating any harm caused by the business”. In fact, there is a viscous circle between business and society and companies have being seen as creating profits at the expense of the community, and not creating profits that automatically benefits the community. Because of that, the government has increasingly perceived business as a problem, as a source of bad practices in society and starts to regulate, to control the tax, so political leaders are unable to pursue business in friendly public policies because the political environment almost forced them to be tuff the business despite the fact that business and society need each other. There are many things that company can do that don’t involve the trade-off, and that’s what company should focus on.