"A Rose for Emily vs Good Country People

830 Words4 Pages
Both, “A Rose for Emily” (1930) by William Faulkner and “Good Country People” (1955) by Flannery O’Connor were written and published towards the middle of the 20th century when the world suffered a lot of changes, especially the American society which started to dominate all the rest of the societies. On both stories the main characters are built through the symbolism, fiction and irony, and as a theme both of them are centered on the individuals represented by Emily and Hulga that are totally opposite to the society where they live into. As a support we can see the structure, the point of view and the characters themselves. If we check both main characters it is very obvious that they have the same kind of relationship with the society where they live and in contrast we can observe the differences in the plots of the stories. William Faulkner and Flannery O’Connor are bringing on the scene main characters that have ideals challenged by the society. They seem to fall into a category of people that are not understood by the others for what they are doing but the way they are thinking. Looking at Emily it is sad to see that her beliefs pull her into isolation from the rest of the community making her the attraction of the town where she used to live. On the other hand Hulga‘s ideas put her into a position of a high educated persons that is not in agreement with the idea to believe in a higher authority. However, at the end she will fall in Manley Pointer’s trap that played the role of a good Christian, exposing her and showing that actually she believed in a way that she didn’t want to admit. The endings in both stories are supported by the behavior of the main characters. Emily for example is pictured as a woman who, even though she came from a family that has a big influence to the town,
Open Document