Furthermore B. In other words C. In fact *D. Of course 4. Which one of the following sentences contains two ideas joined by a connecting word? A. Frank went fishing on Saturday he caught many fish. B. Mike ran after the bus.
What is the name of the common error in the following sentence? Having risen because of the rains, the hikers were unable to cross the river. A. Infinitive phrase B. Prepositional phrase C. Run-on sentence *D. Dangling modifier 7. Which one of the following
a. Overstate the current ratio. b. Understate the current ratio. c. No effect on the current ratio.
4. What is the name of the common error in the following sentence? Having risen because of the rains, the hikers were unable to cross the river. A. Infinitive phrase B. Prepositional phrase C. Dangling modifier D. Run-on sentence 5. Which of the following sentences has a compound predicate?
Point (parenthetical documentation) a. Explanation/sub point b. Explanation/sub point II. [Main idea] A. [Topic sentence/transitional sentence] 1. Point (parenthetical documentation) a. Subpoint (parenthetical documentation) b. Subpoint (parenthetical documentation) 2. Point (parenthetical documentation) B.
“Yeah” I replied with a little sarcasm in my voice. We walked to the car and I opened the truck to display all I had in there. He seen I had a collection of fishing poles and started a conversation about bass fishing. He started with “I see you like fishing?” I said “Yes I do a little bass fishing when I have the time.” He asked “Have you ever done any tournament fishing”. I replied “I had not.” He started to explain to me how the tournaments worked, and how profitable it is if you were good enough.
Sub-Assertions are identified by Capital Letters. They are not pieces of support. The items identified with Lower Case letters (a, b,. . .)
Facts against: In the original negotiation agreement it was stipulated that no distribution contract existed unless it was in writing. Another possible fact that could weigh against Chou is that although the agreement was drafted it was not sent because if the misinterpretation that the email was in fact the contract. Question 3: Does the fact that the parties were communicating by e-mail have any impact on your analysis in Questions 1 and 2 (above)? Communication via email does have some impact to the question of contract but it is not enough to rule out a contract completely. The use of email may be binding if it does not state that the intent is to only negotiate terms.
| | |- be considered metaphors because the word or words used are not taken literally | Note: When the distinction is made, it is the following: when A is used to refer to B, it is a synecdoche if A is a component of B and a metonymy if A is commonly associated with B but not actually part of its whole. PART 3: SUMMARY 1. Which one is the most appropriate definition of metonymy a. Metonymy is the use of comparision of one thing with another. Metonymy is the use of word or phrase to indicate something different from the literal meaning. Metonymy is the use of the name of one thing to substitute for that of another to which it is related.
"Surface water from roads and roofs" got washed into the sewers when it rained and it was not filtered (Brimblecombe 1). "Any dirt or oil on the roads [got] washed straight into the river system" (Brimblecombe 1). Some toilets were set up incorrectly. People set them up to the "drainage system" and the waste went into the river. (Brimblecombe 1) The river was contaminated and no one did anything to fix it.