Whiteness Theory Essay

772 Words4 Pages
In broad terms, whiteness is the production and reproduction of dominance rather than subordination, normativity rather than marginality, and privilege rather than disadvantage. Although whiteness is a form of hegemony, its source of power is not monolithic, complete, or uniform. In an academic climate where the focus of race-based research is inevitably on the racialised “other”, critical whiteness theory attempts to redirect attention onto the white, naturalised self who occupied the discursive position of power. This privileged position should be acknowledged and shifted in order for any kind of racial equality to be achieved. Attempts to do so have been made, both in academe and in politics; the Rudd government’s 2008 apology to Australia’s Indigenous people can be read as said attempt. Amongst many other things, whiteness signifies nationhood. For many this permeates their personal identity. In countries where white people hold greater power, they are in a position to include and exclude others. While whites are often made to feel confident and comfortable with their position of their nation as ‘home’ the ‘other’ often does not. White people can think of themselves as belonging to and making social systems work for them. Feeling that your opinions about national issues are represented in the public discourse has been referred to by Hage as ‘governmental belonging’ ‘Governmental belonging’ gives white people the belief that they have a right to contribute to the governance of their nation, for instance commenting on immigration and who should and should not be allowed in. In Australia, this thinking has resulted in policies – such as multiculturalism which embraces the diversity of minority ethnic groups – being seen as a gift given by the dominant group to minority ethnic groups. In our “multicultural” era, we have studies of “Chicano” narrative, “Asian
Open Document