Decision making with your employees will let them gain respect for the leader and become more determined. This style will bring strength between you and your employees. Laissez-Faire-This style is used when the leader is lazy or distracted, it’s more of a you do what you want style. This style can be used when the team is highly capable and motivated, it’s when the team doesn’t need close monitoring or supervision. This style can cause failure when the leader expects the group to make the decision between themselves when they are un sure about what they need to achieve and how they need to accomplish the task.
McClelland and vroom-This theory is simple and it says people are motivated depending on the outcome. This means if an employee doesn’t like the outcome the task is going to produce, then he or she won’t want to complete the task at hand. This theory says to relate rewards to the performance and it is something that the employee would want. This theory says that if an employee is kept happy then the employee will be motivated to work harder. Tesco would not use this method but parts of it such as get Tesco employee rewards that relate to them and their performance Maslow-This theory says that people’s needs have to be met first before an employer can get the best out of their employees.
Happy and satisfied employees’ decreases the turnover rate within the office and also keeps the moral high. Continuing this shows the high level executives that the General Manager is doing well and optimizing his ability to lead. It is also important for an organization to work as a team. The general manager must know how to execute and communicate the same common goal to different groups. This is very difficult because in order for the team to feel as equally passionate about the common goal, the manager must communicate the goal in a way that makes each employee feel they are doing their part individually to achieve the common goal.
This is not an effective way to get the best result from a team, but it has some advantages in situations where there is pressure to get the task done, like in the armed forces. This leadership style may use threats or intimidation to make sure that subordinates do what the leader requires. This could bring down subordinates by ignoring their knowledge and input. The leader monitors the work and each individual's performance; which is good to make sure that everyone is working. People are motivated by being rewarded; this brings encouragement helping the person who has done well do a better job and help them achieve more in the job.
That would be my first best practice. When employees know the procedures and policies they are required to abide by, and the procedures for how discipline is handle it will make situations easier to handle since all this was informed of ahead of time. It will also provide employees with an understanding that if they do something wrong so and so will happen, before hand which can deter employees from doing that certain act in the first place. Not every company has a set polices or procedure for how discipline is handled therefore this can sometimes create panic for some employees who may fear they loss of their job, simple guide lines by a supervisor can be given as to what may happen to employees when certain actions are taken or not taken. Supervisors should always be aware and encourage employees to discuss any issue with them.
Over time management concepts have evolved into modern techniques that rely more on listening to and understanding the needs of employees as more businesses realize how much more productive employees can be when they have some control in their team or work environment. I do feel that some leadership decisions can and should be made directly by the leader or manager in charge, as there is not always time available or valid reason to ask opinions or suggestions from the entire group. However, there are a lot of leadership decisions that can be better resolved with input from the people that will be directly affected by the decisions. Providing employees some control over their work situation can provide them with more work satisfaction; keeping employees happy in their workplace will
The benefits of a job description are: If the job description is well-written and accurate it helps the company to attract individuals with the right qualifications which will make the selection and recruitment process faster. If the job description includes a good explanation of the job role it will prepare a potential employee what will be expected from him or her. As it will list the minimum requirements only people with the right qualifications and experience will apply and this will save the company time. The limitations are: - Due to a job description an employee may be not as flexible and might refuse to do other tasks that were not listened in the job description. A job description usually just summarizes the tasks that have to be done and this might be very narrow, this will make a potential employee assume that there is not a lot to do in this job and then might not expect the full responsibilities of a job and then might quit for this reason.
This is a major issue because feedback is an essential part of motivating a person and making them feel valued in the company. Employees need to know that their ideas are being heard, and they must be presented with ways to improve themselves or the process as a result. Another, de-motivating factor that is affecting employee motivation is the perception of inequity amongst the supervisors and workers. Workers at the Engstrom have complained that supervisors should not receive
It is important to be able to penetrate any barriers that the employee may have as a defense mechanism. A good manager of people realizes that once you have found an entry point into their employees heart; it is likely that the manager will be successful in motivating the employee. Because people have different personalities not all things goes as planned when you are attempting to motivate your employees. An excerpt from an article on bussinessball.com states: “Developing understanding of personality typology, personality traits, thinking styles and learning styles theories is also a very useful way to improve your knowledge
It also has the disadvantage that employees become dependant on their leader. Persuasive management style involves the manager sharing some characteristics with that of an autocratic manager. The most important aspect of a persuasive manager is that they maintain control over the entire decision making process. The most prominent difference here is that the persuasive manager will spend more time working with their subordinates in order to try to convince them of the benefits of the decisions they have made. A persuasive manager is more aware of the employees but it would be incorrect to say that the style of management is more inclusive of employees.