What Sources And Approaches Are Used By Film Histo

852 Words4 Pages
What sources and approaches are used by film historians to account for the forms and subject-matter of pre-1907 films? To explain what sources and approaches are used by film historians studying pre-1907 forms and subject-matter I first need to talk about the subject-matter and forms themselves. The early years of film were dominated by French and English film makers and companies who made thousands of short films usually up to a minute long and were usually actualities or trick effect films, these films were something of a novelty at the time and there were few successful theatres until 1905. Quite often these films were about people in normal life situations from around the world at the time but there were also fictional films mainly coming from France which lead to films becoming longer, quite often several minutes long. The early approaches to film history looked at how the technology of cinema has evolved which mostly ended up being a dictionary of technological advancements; this is useful in understanding the history and evolutionary progression of film but doesn’t really look into the subject matter of early films as much as it does the forms of them. A more traditional film history approach is the critical approach. In this approach a number of subjects are studied with the main areas being technology, aesthetics, business and the audience of the time. This approach can have it benefits as it allows more of the subject matter of films to be looked at but can have it limitations as it is quite a rigid form or analysis. Another form of approach to film history has lead to many film historians self publicising themselves, using it as a way to take credit for advancements of early film through various publications. This form of approach, known as the great figures approach looks at the works of individuals mostly so it therefore will have some bias

More about What Sources And Approaches Are Used By Film Histo

Open Document