What is the Woman's Language

6293 Words26 Pages
What is the Woman’s Language? It has been suggested that there is such a thing as a woman’s language. Something in the structure of the writing, something about the word choice in the writing, or something about the topics addressed in the writing seems to set the language written by women apart from the language prepared by men - thus creating a woman’s language. Professor of Theatre, Susan Russell, suggests the possibility that a man’s language concentrates on the physical while a woman’s language may concentrate on the emotional. What begs resistance is the idea: is that all? Is the woman’s language capable of focusing on the physical without attaching the emotional, or is it able to include both the emotional and the physical at the same time, or is the woman’s language simply only capable of exploring the emotional through life, personality, and relationships? Is it capable of emphasizing the physical at all? Trinh T. Minh-ha, contemporary women theorist, states in Woman, Native, Other that, “A free man addressing free men, the Sartrian writer “has only one subject – freedom.” He writes to “appeal to the reader’s freedom to collaborate in the production of his work” and paints the world “only so that free men may feel their freedom as they face it.”” So if a person is only capable of writing what they know, Trinh T. Minh-ha may support the statement that a woman can only write for/appeal to women and that a man can only write for/appeal to men. Through an in-depth examination of Margaret Edson’s Wit, there is proof that the woman’s language concentrates on the emotional, but also that it does not confine itself to these barriers. The woman’s language is capable of much more than just that, and this will uncover the ways in which it breaks those barriers. Wit in Summary Wit follows the story of Vivian Bearing, professor and renowned scholar of
Open Document