Good leadership Being a manager means you must have self-discipline and leadership skills. If you can't lead then you shouldn't be in charge. Good leadership means being communicative, diplomatic but at the same time courageous to say what you think. Being a leader means you won't be inconsistent just to be Mr. or Mrs. Popular. You will gain more respect by sticking to your instincts, doing what you believe is right but not being so rigid that you can't revise your opinions.
Active or Passive Diversity: I would say that Tanglewood should look into active diversity because it meets the diverse needs of the customers. Diversity is a huge part of the company’s hiring process and they don’t want to be labeled as hiring only one class of people. Especially since the need of each customer is different Tanglewood needs to make sure that they have the necessary qualified associates to take care of the
Leadership and Teamwork in the Public Services. P1 Authoritarian- This style is used when leaders want their employees to do something, they tell them how they want it done and how they want it accomplished, without getting advice of their followers. This style is more of a bossing around and unprofessional style. Democratic-This style is used when leaders want to include one or more employees in the decision making it is not a sign of weakness, it is so that the employees will be more confident with their own ideas and decision making. Decision making with your employees will let them gain respect for the leader and become more determined.
This excellent service can be done by those that care about our world and the people that inhabit it. Service can be serving others in some helpful way. The main idea of service is that the individual isn’t the most important and other people could use help and good advice. Being a good leader means that the leader knows how to serve the people he is working for. Leadership is another trait that can’t be easily developed, but only with thorough diligence and dedication.
I don’t believe that relationships should be about changing people or trying to make them fit our “standards”, but the person that we want to be with should already make the cut. A little adjustment here and there can never hurt, but if you have to all around change a person as a whole they are not meant for you. In any relationship, the two people should share mutual goals, desires, and have some general expectations for the relationship to be successful. Every individual has some sort of goals, whether they be short or long term. In a relationship however, I feel like the individual’s goals should correlate and somewhat revolve around the same morals, dreams, and wishes as their spouse.
2.3 Describe how own values, belief systems and experiences may affect working practice? • Everyone has different values/beliefs/preferences what you believe in, what you see as important, acceptable or desirable is an essential part of who you are. • React positively to people who share your values and less warmly to people who have different priorities. • When you develop friendships, it is natural to spend time with people who share your interests and values. • Professional relationships you develop with people you support are another matter; you are required to provide the same quality support for all, not just for those who share your views and beliefs.
In the public services, these types of leaderships will be used within different circumstances, authoritarian is best in urgent situations but laissez-faire is better for those who are experts and know exactly what they are doing and don't depend on a leader, they are similar because they both focus on the task in hand but one is directed every step by a demanding leader, sometimes, authoritarian could be bad style to use as it could make the other team members feel under pressure and lack motivation but leading in a laissez-faire manner will make the members feel more important because they have freedom to work the way they feel best. If there was to be a car accident, authoritarian would be a better approach because whether it was ambulance, police or fire, they will need to get the victims to hospital and road cleared as quickly as possible but it'd take longer if the team didn't know what their roles were and what they were
People exchange ideas with others and listen to others experience can decrease the possibility to fail a task. As a result, we can make the integrity of the choices, for example, the commitment of being an architect. Failure is a good way to learn integrity. However, success is a good way to learn too, everyone want success, success gives people the incentive and motivation to do it well again. Success teaches us the things work efficiently.
Without knowing one’s vocation, effective self-leadership is not possible. We best lead ourselves when we lead with a purpose. Otherwise, we run the risk of leading aimlessly. To effectively self-lead, one must define their purpose and how that purpose is to drive them in their leadership of self. It is the leader’s choice whether they are going to lead with their purpose.
However, leadership involves establishing direction, aligning people, and motivating and inspiring. * The importance of leading is enormous but that does not mean managing is not important. Management and leadership are both vital to an organization. "To highlight the need for more leadership is not to minimize the importance of management or managers. It is to say that leadership involves unique processes that are distinguishable from basic management processes" (Bateman & Snell, 2011).