Were the 1920s Really an Age of Tolerance

754 Words4 Pages
The 1920s were filled with xenophobia, fundamentalism and extreme conservatism and so to say that this was an age of tolerance would be incorrect. Many immigrants and foreigners were discriminated against and unfairly treated. The revival of the vigilante group, the KKK, showed the lack of tolerance for those that were described as Un-American. (Unbelievers, bootleggers, those guilty of marital infidelity, criminals and the correct) This group was made up of immigrants, Jews, Blacks and Catholics. An example of how the 1920s were not an age of tolerance was how immigrants were treated badly; a demonstration of this was the case of Sacco and Vanzetti, two Italian-American men, who were arrested and charged with murder and robbery in Massachusetts. They were armed when arrested but there was not enough evidence to pin the blame on them, however they were still found guilty by the judge and sentenced to the electric chair. This just showed how they were caught up in an atmosphere of intolerance and anti-radical prejudice because of their origins and political views. A new trial was rejected and the men were executed in August 1927. The fate of the 2 men symbolised the antipathy felt towards foreigners after the First World War and unfortunately immigrants were the most obvious recipients of this, thus showing that 1920s were not really an age of tolerance. Another reason why it is incorrect to say that the 1920s were really an age of tolerance is because of the views that Americans had on immigrants. Despite America having absorbed 23 million immigrants who brought new languages, cultures and standards to the USA, there were still racist feelings towards immigrants from the White Protestant Americans. They saw the immigrants as “ingestible lumps in the national stomach.” This resulted in brief moments of ‘nativism’ (where those born in the USA were valued) and the

More about Were the 1920s Really an Age of Tolerance

Open Document